XP-39 and the Claims (1 Viewer)

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Status
Not open for further replies.
XBe02Drvr said:
And even if their performances were identical, the P38 was the better machine because of its range. P39 just wasn't suitable for anything beyond interception and local air superiority.
Click to expand...

And I would add, giving fledgling fighter pilots time in something more powerful than an T-6...

The bigger question is how many more pages of round about before this thread is closed as well.

Cheers,
Biff
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)

Similar threads

R
A look at German fighter Ace kill claims
24 25 26
Replies
506
Views
24K
Juha3
J
617th squadron and the bunkers in Ijmuiden.
2
Replies
23
Views
759
DerAdlerIstGelandet
Paper comparing the flight performance of the P-40E Warhawk and the A6M2 Zero
Replies
8
Views
855
Ivan1GFP
I
Any Japanese claims on 10 July 1945?
Replies
0
Views
624
CHen10
M
Pinnacle of Piston fighter: XP-72 vs Spiteful Mk XVI?
3 4 5
Replies
83
Views
6K
Jugman
J
Menu
Log in
Register