The Basket
Senior Master Sergeant
- 3,712
- Jun 27, 2007
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Losing one engine out of four is hardly a big issue, losing one engine out of two isnt a huge issue, modern twin engined passenger planes can fly and land on one engine, the big issue on this flight was that having just taken off it was too heavy to land so it burned fuel off for a while..........hardly a world shattering event, its a new plane so its the focus of attention.
It's big news actually for two reasons.
First, an engine of that size and thrust disentegrating is very uncommon. The amount of energy that such an huge engine failure must contain without incident is hugely impressive.
Second, God Forbid a Thousand Times, the first time a full A380 goes down it will be world news.
One issue we have in the USA is that FAA standards don't always keep pace with new technology so some aircraft get approved before they've been thoroughally tested. Problems get corrected after the planes have been in service - with passengers. I don't know how the Aussie approval system works.
It's big news actually for two reasons.
First, an engine of that size and thrust disentegrating is very uncommon. The amount of energy that such an huge engine failure must contain without incident is hugely impressive.
Second, God Forbid a Thousand Times, the first time a full A380 goes down it will be world news.
Hey guys, any flying has its risks as does driving your car, QANTAS had the same problem with a 747 not so long back when the outer stbd engine blew a fan blade. It's an engine issue guys and at least QANTAS did the right thing and grounded the A-380 fleet immediately until investigations by RR are done.
.
An update from AVweb.com Newsflash
"Qantas A380 Was Heavily Damaged
The Qantas crew whose A380 suffered an uncontained engine failure earlier this month had their hands full in getting the super jumbo back to Singapore. Shrapnel from the engine disabled one of two main hydraulic systems, hampered the fuel transfer system, punched a hole in the forward wing spar and caused a major fuel leak. The cascading nature of such failures meant the pilots couldn't dump enough fuel to bring the aircraft down to its maximum landing weight and the fuel left in the airplane was unbalanced. Flaps, slats and spoilers couldn't be fully deployed and the gear had to be dropped manually. Once it was on the ground, the anti-lock brakes didn't work and, since the damaged engine was an inboard one, there was only one left for reverse thrust (the outboard engines of A380s don't have reversers because they often overhang the grass and might be FOD damaged). The heavy, significantly disabled aircraft needed virtually all of the 13,123 feet of available runway. The whole wing might have to be replaced and the aircraft is expected to be out of commission for months. Meanwhile, the cause of the engine problem has been determined and it's just adding to the PR problems facing manufacturer Rolls-Royce."
What a ride...