Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I read somewhere (can't recall where) the explosions were at 70m deep, not too deep to need very high tech.The pipeline explosions have to be sabotage - but who would be capable of bombing the pipeline at those depths?
This isn't going to be someone making a bomb in a pressure-cooker in their living room, this is the work of someone who has access to high tech equipment...like a military.
Move along people. Nothing to see here but bubbling Putin farts.
70m (229 feet) is still beyond a scuba diver's max. depth, which is 130 feet (39m).I read somewhere (can't recall where) the explosions were at 70m deep, not too deep to need very high tech.
I can't see the profit Rusia want to have by blowing the pipes. What could be the thinking behind it if that was russian made?
The most likely explanation is that it was the USA.I read somewhere (can't recall where) the explosions were at 70m deep, not too deep to need very high tech.
I can't see the profit Rusia want to have by blowing the pipes. What could be the thinking behind it if that was russian made?
As I said earlier, the last thing Georgia needs is more Russians. Russian-backed separatists in South Ossetia and Abkhazia will jump at the opportunity to use demography as a weapon once more.This sucks if you're one of those Russians trying to flee over the border into Georgia:
Russia's submarine fleet has been preparing to disrupt the communication cables between North America and Europe for years. I assume the same techniques can hit a gas line.70m (229 feet) is still beyond a scuba diver's max. depth, which is 130 feet (39m).
Highly trained and equipped divers (technical divers) can attain a maximum depth of 350 feet (106m), but only with support (crew, dive ship, appropiate equipment).
Russia is not beyond creating a false situation to justify their actions.
Europe is no longer a major consumer of their gas, so they are angry and spiteful.
There is no profit in that, since Warren Buffett has no direct rail connection with Europe.The most likely explanation is that it was the USA.
Russia had leverage over Germany by way of the pipeline, being able to resume gas deliveries whenever the Germans were willing to negotiate - the Russians said as much just a few days ago. But now with the pipeline destroyed the Germans have no choice but to rely on US gas imports.
The most likely explanation is that it was the USA.
Russia had leverage over Germany by way of the pipeline, being able to resume gas deliveries whenever the Germans were willing to negotiate - the Russians said as much just a few days ago. But now with the pipeline destroyed the Germans have no choice but to rely on US gas imports.
Goodness. The Kremlin's propaganda ministry had better get some FSB re-education goons off to the state TV station pronto. Clearly the commentors have lost the plot.
Not sure if you're joking or just part of the "the U.S. is evil" bandwagon, but the U.S. has zero to gain from destroying the pipelines (which weren't in use, by the way).The most likely explanation is that it was the USA.
Russia had leverage over Germany by way of the pipeline, being able to resume gas deliveries whenever the Germans were willing to negotiate - the Russians said as much just a few days ago. But now with the pipeline destroyed the Germans have no choice but to rely on US gas imports.
Hey, Tucker said it, so it must be true!
How about that bit about minorities, FFS.WOW....JUST WOW!!!!
Everyone's a hero when it's the mighty Russian Army stomping on those puny Ukrainian nazis. But with Ukraine on on the offensive, now it's "There must be a mistake!" or "I'm too old!" or "There must be someone else!"