MiTasol
1st Lieutenant
The RAN is well above the capability of the RCN. I ran a quick comparison via ChatGPT (so take it with bag of salt):
"Make me a comparison chart of the RCN vs the RAN"
Feature Royal Canadian Navy (RCN) Royal Australian Navy (RAN) Founded 1910 1913 Headquarters Ottawa, Ontario Canberra, Australian Capital Territory Motto "Safer Seas, Stronger Canada" "Integrity, Capability, Loyalty" Fleet Size Approximately 30 ships (as of 2023) Approximately 50 ships (as of 2023) Submarines 4 modern submarines (Victoria class) 6 modern submarines (Collins class) Surface Combatants 12 Halifax-class frigates 9 Anzac-class frigates, 3 Hobart-class destroyers Support Vessels Auxiliary ships, replenishment ships Supply ships, hydrographic vessels Air Arm CH-148 Cyclone helicopters, fixed-wing support MH-60R Seahawk, MRH-90 Taipan helicopters Operational Focus Arctic operations, anti-submarine warfare Regional security, humanitarian missions International Alliances NATO, Commonwealth, various coalitions ANZUS, Commonwealth, various coalitions Major Exercises RIMPAC, TRIDENT JUNCTURE, and others RIMPAC, Talisman Sabre, and others Current Challenges Aging fleet, modernization needs Capacity expansion, balancing regional threats
A quick eye will see that calling the Victoria class SSKs modern is a stretch, while the RAN is missing its Canberra-class LHDs. Damn Canada should have bought those Mistrals.
The Anzac frigates are way down on the performance of the German frigates they are licenced copies of because of the Au "improvements" and the Taipan helicopters have all been broken up and buried - instead of being given to Ukraine who wanted them and could have successfully operated them.
At 30 years old the Collins subs are like your Victoria class boats - technological dinosaurs.