delcyros
Tech Sergeant
As well as range wasn´t part of the question. It all belongs to agility and speed, so the F8F is a reasonable choice.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Udet said:Glider: the fundamental British testings used by most of the present day allied revisionists come from the ones carried out with a Bf 109 G-6/R6 fitted with underwing cannons. It was a Wilde Sau fighter who landed intact in a British airfield.
Do you think the 1.8 ata K-4s would have had that much trouble dogfighting with any of the Mk XIVs?
So Mr. Jabber, they tested "over 20 different 109s". Questions:
(1) Where are the results of such testings to be found?
(2) Do you have copies of such testings that you can share?
(3) Have you seen the sheets?
Quote:
"However, both sides generally got the fundamentals right when testing enemy equipment. Engineering and mechanical principles don't really change that much."
With the battle results of RAF vs Luftwaffe -before the full assembly of the 8th and 15th- I do not think the Brits quite got them.
The vaunted and glorified Spitfire Mk XIV which was produced in very modest numbers to say to the least.
Spit IXs had no trouble with any of the 109s that took part in Bodenplatte.Do you think the 1.8 ata K-4s would have had that much trouble dogfighting with any of the Mk XIVs?
KraziKanuK said:Spit IXs had no trouble with any of the 109s that took part in Bodenplatte.Do you think the 1.8 ata K-4s would have had that much trouble dogfighting with any of the Mk XIVs?
KraziKanuK said:Spit IXs had no trouble with any of the 109s that took part in Bodenplatte.Do you think the 1.8 ata K-4s would have had that much trouble dogfighting with any of the Mk XIVs?
Udet said:KraziKanuK said:Spit IXs had no trouble with any of the 109s that took part in Bodenplatte.Do you think the 1.8 ata K-4s would have had that much trouble dogfighting with any of the Mk XIVs?
Really? Can you please provide a list Spitfire Mk. IX aces, and the number of Bf 109s they shot down?
Glider said:Nearly all British and Commonwealth Aces flew Spits so take your pick.
Hunter makes some good points but one question is 'If the late 109's were that good, why did the vast majority of German pilots prefer the 190'?'
KraziKanuK said:Udet said:KraziKanuK said:Spit IXs had no trouble with any of the 109s that took part in Bodenplatte.Do you think the 1.8 ata K-4s would have had that much trouble dogfighting with any of the Mk XIVs?
Really? Can you please provide a list Spitfire Mk. IX aces, and the number of Bf 109s they shot down?
Don't have to be aces.
#2 in XIVs got a K-4
#401 in IXs got 4 109s
#403 in XIVs got 3 109s
#414 in IXs got 3 109s
IXs - 7, XIVs - 4
Could be more but I wasted enough time.
LOL, even the Typhoon got some 109s.
A total of 22 109 Gs and Ks lost to RAF fighters.
It was IXs from 401 which got the 1st CW 262.
ps @ hunter. Most IXs were fighter bombers so would have only basic combat fighter experience.
Erich said:it was not preference but what was offered to them in their Geschwaders