Best tank killer aircraft of WW2 Part I

• Oct 31, 2004

• #561

lesofprimus

Brigadier General

18,831

47

Jul 27, 2004

Long Island Native in Mississippi

ihatemeatballs.com

Of course there is... When new members and guests read this thread they wont read a bunch of spammed crap.....

 

• Nov 1, 2004

• #562

Maestro

Master Sergeant

2,638

5

Apr 12, 2004

Beaupré, Province of Québec, Canada

I agree.

 

• Nov 1, 2004

• #563

cheddar cheese

Major General

20,265

21

Jan 9, 2004

WSM, England

There is spammed crap all over the place.

 

• Nov 1, 2004

• #564

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,937

17

Dec 20, 2003

i still think we might as well delete it......................

 

• Nov 1, 2004

• #565

cheddar cheese

Major General

20,265

21

Jan 9, 2004

WSM, England

Then why not delete all the spam?

 

• Nov 2, 2004

• #566

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,937

17

Dec 20, 2003

because it would takes ages..................

 

• Nov 2, 2004

• #567

cheddar cheese

Major General

20,265

21

Jan 9, 2004

WSM, England

Exactly.

 

• Nov 5, 2004

• #568

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,937

17

Dec 20, 2003

but i don't have to do it so it's not my problem................

 

• Nov 5, 2004

• #569

cheddar cheese

Major General

20,265

21

Jan 9, 2004

WSM, England

Not mine either Admin problem that...

 

• Nov 9, 2004

• #570

M

Medvedya

Master Sergeant

2,358

12

Nov 9, 2004

Bristol, UK

Sorry to be dull, but going back to the topic, I'd have to say the Tiffie - no question.

 

• Nov 10, 2004

• #571

cheddar cheese

Major General

20,265

21

Jan 9, 2004

WSM, England

The IL-2 was far better The Tiffy was great, but not as effective as the IL-2.

 

• Nov 12, 2004

• #572

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,937

17

Dec 20, 2003

well both were effective, but they faught in different enviroments............

 

• Nov 12, 2004

• #573

cheddar cheese

Major General

20,265

21

Jan 9, 2004

WSM, England

I know, but even you said the IL-2 was the better one.

 

• Nov 12, 2004

• #574

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,937

17

Dec 20, 2003

indeed it was, but the tiffy would win in a dogfight...............

 

• Nov 12, 2004

• #575

cheddar cheese

Major General

20,265

21

Jan 9, 2004

WSM, England

Yeah I agree there. Actually im not 100% sure. The IL-2 had a hell of a lot of armour, and a tail gunner...

 

• Nov 12, 2004

• #576

lesofprimus

Brigadier General

18,831

47

Jul 27, 2004

Long Island Native in Mississippi

ihatemeatballs.com

Do u have any idea how many Sturms went down to enemy air action???? A SHIzITLOAD.....

The Tiffy would be no exception, and easily own a dogfight with a Il-2....

 

• Nov 13, 2004

• #577

cheddar cheese

Major General

20,265

21

Jan 9, 2004

WSM, England

Hmmmmm ok.

 

• Nov 13, 2004

• #578

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,937

17

Dec 20, 2003

and 4x20mm wil do allot of damage, even to an IL-2..................

 

• Nov 13, 2004

• #579

cheddar cheese

Major General

20,265

21

Jan 9, 2004

WSM, England

I never really see the Tiffy as a ground attack aircraft, it just doesnt look like it would be any good in the role.

 

• Nov 13, 2004

• #580

the lancaster kicks ass

Major General

19,937

17

Dec 20, 2003

but you have to see it firing rockets, they made it one of the best ground attack aircraft of the war, and you have to remeber it was a big beefy plane that could take it's fair share of damage................