Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
It wasn'tAlthough it was inferior to the P-47 and P-51 it seems that it was good enough to continue production at the end of 1944...
JoeProof?
Joe
not proof conclusive but certainly compelling, the Curtiss XP-46A; not the clearest picture in the world
Below: The Curtiss XP-46A. Was this the rabbit Dutch Kindleberger carefully put into his P-51 hat? USAF
The arguments being used to define the P40 as WW2s best aircraft actually fit the F4F Wildcat better. Overall, it had much greater impact on the war's outcome than the P40 and it had a better record against the A6M than did the P40.
In N.Africa the P-40's main foe was the Bf/Me 109F/G's on paper, a vastly
superior plane, flown by German aces.
It did?P-40 had a very good record against the A6M...
but the F4F wasn't in China/Burma/India
Joe
not proof conclusive but certainly compelling, the Curtiss XP-46A; not the clearest picture in the world
Below: The Curtiss XP-46A. Was this the rabbit Dutch Kindleberger carefully put into his P-51 hat? USAF
so by best.. that was just my opinion. it held the lines for almost 3 years. and flown right to the
end. had a very impressive record against some of the best machines out there. considering
the P-40 was obselete according to some at the beggining of the war, thats a hell of an
accomplishment. obselete? I think not. thanks for reading
~Greg
Wiki's therefrom wiki
Wiki's there
if I really can't be bothered to get my lazy ass out of my chair and take a walk over to my bookshelf
[/I]
At some point in 1943 it was decided that NO new US fighter groups would be issued P-40s for over seas use.Looking at it by the numbers, the last of the line, the P-40N was capable of 340mph at 15,000ft. Its contemporary, the Nakajima Ki-84 approached 400mph 5,000ft overhead of the N. The Bf109K was capable of 450mph at roughly the same height as the Ki-84. All three aircraft were in production in 1944 and while Curtiss-Wright managed to sell 6,000+ P-40Ns, there appears to be little in the way of confirmation as to how many actually saw combat.
Greg, I took you seriously up to now. But if you have studied this for 25+ years and you come up with this BS ...In N.Africa the P-40's main foe was the Bf/Me 109F/G's on paper, a vastly
superior plane, flown by German aces. Yet the P-40's had a 3:1 k/r against them IF you believe the
lowest numbers.
Oh absolutelyAt some point in 1943 it was decided that NO new US fighter groups would be issued P-40s for over seas use.
P-40s would be supplied to US allies and would continue to be supplied to advanced training units in the continental US. They may have been used by some groups as initial equipment as they worked up in the US before transferring overseas and being re-equipped.
By the start of 1944 the US was under no illusion that the P-40 was a world class fighter. A useful ground attack plane or fighter bomber perhaps but not a true fighter plane.
Continental US training units? 6,000+ Ns? TP-40s hadn't been needed since 1940 but suddenly in 1944 they were needed?