Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
The victims do not deser4ve to live with the knowledge that their torturer is alive out there. Killing the perverts is the only civilised way to handle it.
Sorry guys, but I can't agree with you. It's easy to say "kill them", but not when "them" has a face and a name you've known since childhood.
When I was younger, I wanted her and her boyfriend jailed, but what proof was there? As the years went on, they broke up, he died, and she remarried, then became a widow. Now, publically accusing her would serve no purpose.
CD
I am a christian and I do understand that the best way to get past it is to forgive. I really admire the courage it takes to do that. You are a kinder person than I am.Sorry guys, but I can't agree with you. It's easy to say "kill them", but not when "them" has a face and a name you've known since childhood.
When I was younger, I wanted her and her boyfriend jailed, but what proof was there? As the years went on, they broke up, he died, and she remarried, then became a widow. Now, publically accusing her would serve no purpose.
CD
I honestly have no sympathy for them, honestly. I don't want their victims to pay taxes to feed and house them.I never said they shouldn't be incarcerated or otherwise controlled, just that they shouldn't be executed. I could back sterilization or induced impotence, too, except it wouldn't stop a dedicated abuser (especially a female one).
They are sick, of that I have no doubt. It'll be a long time before we learn enough about how human minds work to be able to cure that kind of sickness. In the meantime, do we treat them as the people of years past treated other, more obviously mentally ill, or do we try to treat them more humanely?
CD
The victims do not deserve to live with the knowledge that their torturer is alive out there. Killing the perverts is the only civilised way to handle it.
it reminds me of a radio article I once heard whilst I was driving..Anyone who hurts a child like that does not need psychiatric help, but jail time...
Because you say so? Ok, whatever. Why don't we be really civilised and not ever punish anyone at all because it would be "bad" and "mean"?There's absolutely nothing civilized about killing another human being, for WHATEVER reason. This is the twenty-first century, people. The human race needs to grow up. These people need psychiatric care, not a firing squad.
It was a while ago and I don't remember the details but he came out of it resolute in his belief that paedophiles are cunning, manipulative, devious and totally driven; his experience of them was that, once caught, they plead for 'help' when help is the last thing on their minds, they want to offend again and keep offending and they'll say, agree to or comply with anything that will give them the freedom to do that.
Until we figure out how to really cure such illnesses, we have to keep these sick people away from society. I can't agree with killing them, but I can agree with locking them away.
Unfortunately, our medicine, both phyiscal and psychological, is still pretty primative. We've learned a lot, especially in the last hundred years or so, but we're still not much advanced beyond leeches. We've got a long way to go. The problem is, do we just kill the ones who are sick, or do we try to me humane?
CD
Because you say so? Ok, whatever. Why don't we be really civilised and not ever punish anyone at all because it would be "bad" and "mean"?
That's ok, guys like Essex want to help them get what they wanted. Put 'em away for a month for some useless therapy, then they are "cured" enough to go rape another kid.