Airframes
Benevolens Magister
A rather spurious repaint too!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Stars and bars too small. Goose emblem too small. Stenciled letters wrong. Number missing from the lower front cowl. Line of the anti-glare in front of the windscreen wrong. Looks like the only thing that's close is the nose art.
It amazes me that we spent so much time and effort researching and painting these little models, then the guys that are doing the real thing for a museum display do something like this when by just looking closely at those two B/W photos they could have made it look 100% better with hardly any extra effort.
I agree, and find it rather irritating. The main thing seen 'wrong' on many restorations are the actual colour shades, and this one is no exception. OK, some could argue "It's my aircraft, so that's what I've done with it".
Well, if someone is going to go to the trouble to paint something to represent the actual aircraft, then at least get the colour shades and details right!
And, of course, at some point in the future, when all those who have the knowledge regarding colours, markings, details etc have passed on, these spuriously marked examples could be accepted as accurate!
That museum version looks like a $20 hooker.