IIRC all the EE stuff was printed before that new photo surfaced...
I was rather surprised though that the D-11, 220017 was mistaken as 220012 in EE vol.2, I was aware of 220017 years before vol.2 was published, just goes to show that sometimes the pics that nail a subject don't always get in to the right hands till it's too late...
I was rather surprised though that the D-11, 220017 was mistaken as 220012 in EE vol.2, I was aware of 220017 years before vol.2 was published, just goes to show that sometimes the pics that nail a subject don't always get in to the right hands till it's too late...