Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
That forward gearbox sure does sing! I've seen P39s a couple of times at airshows, but never close enough to hear that.Here is a P-39 restoration. Despite this thread, the P-39 is a very desirable warbird, and quite rare. If you're flying it VFR, it is down where its performance is good relative to other warbirds. Most of them don't spend a lot of time at 25,000 feet these days.
Seems like a good job of restoration. Hope to be showing one soon of a P-63!
On a serious note I found this on Joe Bauger's site Wartime Service of P-39 with USAAF
The 31st Fighter Group was provided with Airacobras in Southern England in August of 1942. Between August and October of 1942, the Group participated in missions against enemy targets in France. The Group suffered heavy losses in air-to-air combat against the Luftwaffe, and the 31st FG re-equipped with Spitfire Mk Vs.
I cant find any reference to the 31st fighter group using anything other than Spitfires in that period.
If you read Drgondog's post 3356 on this thread he quotes actions by P-39s and a P-39 was claimed by A LW pilot. That site was one of the ones I was alluding to when I asked the question.Joe must have got in a muddle with this one, according to this site 31st FG the unit travelled by sea to the UK without planes and converted to Spitfires. Their only claims / losses were on the Dieppe raid.
With reference to the links below.Joe must have got in a muddle with this one, according to this site 31st FG the unit travelled by sea to the UK without planes and converted to Spitfires. Their only claims / losses were on the Dieppe raid.
Further to the point - an 8th AF escort mission required multiplying the above by 3X to get three full squadrons (Plus usually 2 spares per squadron, and leaving out the fuel consumption of the last squadron as they sit 'warming up' prior to taxiing to the active.I read Nanette, Edwards Park's first book about 20 years ago, so I knew the local library had a copy, so I checked it out a reread it last night, and today.
Not a big book, just 186 pages.
It describes their take off and joining up procedures.
P39 expert left out one important detail. A circle.
They did take off 2 by 2, then joined another 2 to form a flight.
Then the first 4 began a climbing circle, the other flights joined during the circling climb.
When everything was done right, they'd usually have all 4 flights joined by the time they'd completed one circle, and take a heading for their assigned mission.
A lot of the missions were done with just one flight, but joined other flights from another of the many fields around Port Moresby, P40s or P38s..
I'll quote Park from Nanette pg 18-19.
" But that wasn't the thing that was really wrong about the P-39 ( he's referring to it's tumbling habit ) The plane was simply underpowered for the kind of work it was supposed to do. It could not climb high enough or quickly enough, it could not go fast enough except in a dive, ( when it had a tendency to go too fast), it could not maneuver handily enough. It's controls were extremely delicate. The slightest hint of abruptness on the pilots part would be rewarded with a high speed stall .
Just the words of one man who flew the P-39
Actually, the universe is at odds with itself re: P-39 actually being flown by 31st FG in combat. The 8th AF VC detail Victory credits have 2 P-39 victories on 19 August, 1942. Frank Olynyk (whom I trust most of historians) has Spit V and Roger Freeman has Spitfire assigned to 31st upon arrival in Britain. JG 26 Hermichen stated Aircobra for August 19th - amidst another victory claim for a Spitfire in the same area around Dieppe.Joe must have got in a muddle with this one, according to this site 31st FG the unit travelled by sea to the UK without planes and converted to Spitfires. Their only claims / losses were on the Dieppe raid.
I've seen cutaway drawings of the gearbox but don't recall if the gears are straight-cut or helical, but it sure sounds alot like a Pete Jackson gear drive for a small block Chevy!That forward gearbox sure does sing! I've seen P39s a couple of times at airshows, but never close enough to hear that.
And still what Park did write was just the bare minimum , like I said earlier, dumbed down for the general public.Again, the comedy value of this thread just keeps on giving and giving.
People had pointed out numerous times that escorting fighters would have to circle the base to form up. The Expert then cites a source that seems to contradict it...but he misses out the key part of the story where the source explicitly states they were flying a circle.
I've seen some impressive efforts at muddying the waters in debates on this forum, but that one really does take first prize.
Or for non-pilots who read the manualAnd still what Park did write was just the bare minimum , like I said earlier, dumbed down for the general public.
The novel suggested method would result in an angry looking formation of 50 aircraft in pairs, 25 miles across and 10,000ft separation in altitude from one side to the other.Again, the comedy value of this thread just keeps on giving and giving.
People had pointed out numerous times that escorting fighters would have to circle the base to form up. The Expert then cites a source that seems to contradict it...but he misses out the key part of the story where the source explicitly states they were flying a circle.
I've seen some impressive efforts at muddying the waters in debates on this forum, but that one really does take first prize.
In the movie Heartbreak Ridge, Clint Eastwoods character Gunny Highway said it best, when asked by the CO what the hell was going on, to which he replied, "It's a clusterf—k sir!".The novel suggested method would result in an angry looking formation of 50 aircraft in pairs, 25 miles across and 10,000ft separation in altitude from one side to the other.
Actually, the universe is at odds with itself re: P-39 actually being flown by 31st FG in combat. The 8th AF VC detail Victory credits have 2 P-39 victories on 19 August, 1942. Frank Olynyk (whom I trust most of historians) has Spit V and Roger Freeman has Spitfire assigned to 31st upon arrival in Britain. JG 26 Hermichen stated Aircobra for August 19th - amidst another victory claim for a Spitfire in the same area around Dieppe.
I relied on 8th AF and JG 26 as primary source but have no dog in this hunt as I have never been certain. My logic is that 350th FG conclusively were assigned P-400 that RAF did not want. ALL my sources agree that, and that it was briefly assigned to 8th AF. My father's last USAF job was Dpty COS - Missiles Div, ADC to M.Gen Sandy McCorkle - former CO of 31st. McCorkle was NOT with 31st in England, joined in 1943 as CO. That said, he 'remembered' that 1st flew Aircobra's in England before conversion to Spits.
If so, where did they go - the 350th FG?
Redesignated 31st Fighter Group in May 1942. Moved to England, May-June 1942. Assigned to Eighth Air Force and equipped with Spitfires. Entered combat in August 1942. Supported a raid made by Canadian, British, American, and French forces at Dieppe on 19 August. Escorted bombers and flew patrol and diversionary missions until Oct.
Stig, the Eagle Squadrons were so designated (4th FG).I have no dog (or groundhog) in this either; but something's not right and I think that Joe Baugher got mixed up with the the 31st Pursuit Group (39th, 40th, 41st fs) that flew P-39's in the States.
The squadrons are also redesignated: 334th, 335th, 336th.
31st Fighter Group in World War II - Honor Roll Project