- Thread starter
-
- #521
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Same thing with that "hot dog" in CFS3 nearly 15 years ago.Well we shouldn't use WT as a source of reliable data, but when simulated engagements were flown between MiG-17s and various USAF and USN types in the late '60s the message was clear: only engage the MiG on your terms. In slow-speed manoeuvring dog fights the MiG always won out. Advice was to use speed in order to pull out of range and only re-engage if the odds were in your favour. It therefore doesn't take too much of an extrapolation to assume that the same would be true of an F-14.
Had someone tell me not even 10 minutes ago, "F-4 phantom is the best gun fighter there ever was, it had the most gun kill in world war 2. How else do you think we won." I asked them if they were serious and they said yes
No the war the US and ZimbabweThe world War II between Canada and U.S.?
I missed that oneNo the war the US and Zimbabwe
Maybe he meant the F 4F antom?Had someone tell me not even 10 minutes ago, "F-4 phantom is the best gun fighter there ever was, it had the most gun kill in world war 2. How else do you think we won." I asked them if they were serious and they said yes
maybe, i love that variant of the f4u thoughMaybe he meant the F 4F antom?
I must admit when I first started reading these pages I got confused. As a Brit, an F4 was a Phantom thats what I grew up looking at, thn I started reading about F4-Fs and F4-Us which are strange names for a Wildcat and Corsair.maybe, i love that variant of the f4u though
Using numbers instead of names should be more precise until your code system gives three famous marques the same code of "F4". With only 26 letters and 10 numbers it was bound to happen, I suppose.I got razzed for the same mistake but I'm senile.
Thinking that thing made it through Temperatures as Hot as 35k degrees twice when the materials its made of melts at 5k is hilarious. But kids believe in Santa so adults gotta believe in something.
Obviously a scientist of note "Temperatures as Hot as 35k degrees" Degrees of what, C or F? Or since he uses "35k" does he mean Kelvin.I thought this belonged here.
Someone talking about the moon landing
35000 degrees is quite a claim I would say.
That would be interesting. What material melts at 5 Kelvin?Obviously a scientist of note "Temperatures as Hot as 35k degrees" Degrees of what, C or F? Or since he uses "35k" does he mean Kelvin.