thehortenman
Recruit
- 8
- May 20, 2009
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
You'd also have to include weapons, avionics and environmental systems. The basic design offered performance slightly less than 2nd generation fightersMike was talking about the design. If you take the design and put updated engines and composites tech... Its a killer.
TK
Yes, The front view was the major concern. We took alot of care to make the replica accurate. Even down to the fan blades... The Horten bros figured out the stability issue. It was to put the cg more forward and the engine exausts up on the aft deck. It had a stabalizing effect. Jack Northrop haddent figured that out until the enterance of the B2. Also the exaust placement made a big difference in radar detection. Compare the aft deck/b2.... Any more questions? Id be glad to try to answer them.
Tim Knott
I was wondering the same thing...Hmm... why did hortenmann delete/edit all his posts ?
The Ho IX V1 was tested by the Hortens, without power. The V1 crash landed, not sure if they ever repaired it or not, but the project at that time was handed over to Gotha.
The Ho IX V2 was tested and flown by the Gotha team...The V2 was destroyed when one of the Jumo 004 engines caught on fire during a flight, causing it to crash land.
The Ho229 everyone is familiar with, is the Ho IX V3...which never flew.
I have never heard or read about any competition between the Ho229 and a Me262, not saying that it didn't happen, but if it did, I would think that it would have been written down somewhere.
The only notable competition (demonstration) between a prototype and another aircraft, was in 1941 where the He280 shamed a Fw190.