If italy Joined the allies World War 2

Would the allies have been succesful if italy had joined them

  • Total voters
    8

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

FLYBOYJ said:
What I quoted were Stalin's exact words from the Yalta conference. Yes, not believable and again history speaks for itself. My point is the "poison chalice" quote is yours, not Stalin's?
Click to expand...
The quote is mine, but Stalin had the same opinion: the past taught him that Poland only caused troubles for Russia and that it was better off without Poland , and the future (August 1944, June 1956, 1970, 1981 ) proves that my quote is correct .
Besides, if Stalin did not think that Poland was a poisoned chalice, why did he leave Central Poland with Warsaw to Hitler ?
Before, during and after the war the Cheka killed tens of thousands of anti communist/anti-Russian Poles ( there were a lot of Katyns ) and,what was the result ? The result was that the anti Soviet/Russian hostility in Poland was increasing .
 
And I suppose Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia were over run by the Soviet Union by accident?
"Oops, didn't see you guys there, sorry!"

Finland seemed to be having issues with the Soviets, too.

So one asks, at what point these four nations being occupied (one held out, obviously) would create a barrier against Germany?
The premise that Stalin had no idea of Germany invading Poland (or was surprised) is baseless.
So is the excuse the the Soviet Union only wanted Poland as a "buffer" against German aspirations.
Also claiming that the USSR was neutral (while it was fighting the Japanese and Finns) makes no sense.
Switzerland and Sweden were Neutral - meaning they weren't actively invading/fighting someone.
 
The Soviet invasions (or reconquest; take your pick) of the Baltic States and Finland was probably no more to spread bolshevism* than to restore what the rulers of the USSR -- who were very much products of the Russian Empire -- thought was rightfully their territory. In the case of Finland, which had somewhat more autonomy than did most of the territories conquered by Russia, the Soviets were unsuccessful. Since I view motivations as less important than actions, whether the Soviets invaded Poland to spread bolshevism or because of revanchism** is largely irrelevant: any invader planning on permanent control will either co-opt or destroy the elites***.

While it is possible to be simultaneously at war and neutral -- the USSR was neutral in the Commonwealth/US/Japan war in the Pacific but not in the Europe, as was the US with regards to the Ottoman Empire, but not Germany, in WW1 -- this was only possible because the US had no significant presence in the Eastern Mediterranean or North Africa and the USSR's border conflicts over the Manchuria|Siberia border were of a low priority for both parties. In both cases, neutrality towards one of the allies of a multinational military alliance was because of distance. For the most part, Europe was much too densely populated for a nation to have this sort of limited neutrality: one needed to maintain neutrality towards everybody or nobody: Finland was not neutral, as far as the US or UK was concerned, it was just too minor to be a concern, so a Finnish diplomat in Washington or London could be expelled or interned.

-----

* I suspect that bolshevism was already in the Baltics; witness, for example, the Red Latvian Rifles.
** Definition of revanchism | Dictionary.com
*** What happened to the English aristocrats who didn't get co-opted by the Normans?
 
Stalin knew very well that Germany would attack Poland .
The Baltics were occupied because in the past they belonged to Russia .
That Stalin was fighting against Japan , a possible enemy of the Wallies, on the other side of the world,does not disqualify him as neutral in the war between the Wallies and Germany .
He attacked Finland because he wanted a small part of Finland which Finland refused .
The whining of the French and British media about Finland,was only hypocrisy, as they would have remained silent if Stalin had declared war on Germany in September 1939 and attacked Finland in December 1939 .
 
That the Soviets waited 2 1/2 weeks to launch their invasion was, perhaps, Stalin waiting to see what the reaction in the West would be. When he saw that they would do little to interfere, he struck, gobbling up the Baltic states and the agreed upon partition of Poland.
Similarly, when advancing into Poland in 1944, he waited while the Germans crushed the Warsaw Uprising, eliminating many Polish freedom fighters. Fewer for the Soviets to have to deal with after the occupation.
 
Stalin had to wait to see what the effect of the UK and French ultimatum and declaration of war was
 
ljadw said:
The Baltics were occupied because in the past they belonged to Russia .
Click to expand...
Interesting.
The Grand Duchy of Lithuania was annexed by the Russian Empire in the 1700's. It never "belonged" to Russia.
Latvia was originally ruled by the Germans. The Poles.and Lithuanians took it from the Germans. Then the Swedes assumed control in the 1600's after their war with Poland. Imperial Russia took over the Latvia in the 1700's.
Estonia was ruled by Germans, Poles, Swedes and even Denmark before becoming a part of thw Russian Empire.

So we simply cannot Cherry Pick which nation these Baltic states "belong" to.

Each one was declared a sovereign nation in 1918 and as such, are no longer available for reclamation by some distant claim. Otherwise, Italy could declare itself the reincarnation of the Roman Empire and claim all of Europe and large portions of the Mediterranean as their rightful property...
 
Greg Boeser said:
No Pole would be surprised.
Click to expand...

A Polish officer who spent most of WWII in a POW camp told me about the Soviet invasion. His attitude was that war with the Germans was what you expected war to be like. As for the Soviets, he had a much harsher opinion; they took his parents out of Poland and they died in a camp. In his view the Germans saved him from the Soviets, because when he finally escaped he lined up with the US Army.

I hope he lived to see Poland free. But I last saw him in 1978, and I doubt that.
 
Last edited:

That is still a far cry from the Poles knowing anything. That is surmise. Again, look up the two words. Language matters.

As for Stalin's good intentions, that's entirely another thread. Suffice it to say that as many people he had put to death by labor or execution, I don't lend much credence to Stalin's alleged good intentions.

ETA: The secret protocol addressed much more than the partition of Poland. Quoted below from the Wilson Center's archives:

The original agreement:

1. In the event of territorial-political reorganization of the districts making up the Baltic states (Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), the northern border of Lithuania is simultaneously the border of the spheres of interest of Germany and the USSR. The interests of Lithuania with respect to the Vilnius district are recognized by both sides.

2. In the event of territorial-political reorganization of the districts making up the Polish Republic, the border of the spheres of interest of Germany and the USSR will run approximately along the Pisa, Narew, Vistula, and San rivers.

3. Concerning southeastern Europe, the Soviet side emphasizes the interest of the USSR in Bessarabia. The German side declares its complete political disinterest in these areas.

4. This protocol will be held in strict secrecy by both sides.

Further amendments to the secret annex are also listed in the linked document. The secret annex specifically mentions the Baltic states and Bessarabia in addition to carving up Poland, so your claim that it wasn't about defining "spheres of interest" (i.e., partitions) is inaccurate. One part of the Pact -- oddly enough, the one which was not public knowledge -- divided Eastern Europe, including but not limited to Poland, between the two signatories.
 
Last edited:
This is the starting point of any nationalist politician. Always hark back to the time when some prince or potentate had temporarily brought a large area under their political sway.
 
OK, your comment so noted - all good, but earlier the comment was made about the Poles having "a choice." Many years ago I spent time in a part of upstate NY where there was a large Polish population and I actually met transplants who lived through the German and Soviet invasions/occupations. I think if you had made that statement to some of them you probably would have found great distress applied to your facial area or would have had a striking blow from a sizable shoe to your lower extremities. The impression I got from these people were BOTH Soviets and Nazis were hated and they had NO choice. In the aftermath of WW2 they realized that they were just a part of the pie and did their best to endure until the time was right or if they had the opportunity to leave, which many of them did. (Ever hear of the Mirabel shuffle?) The impression I got from these survivors was they didn't want to make a choice, they just wanted to be left alone.
 
My friend the WWII Polish POW came to the US after the war (he met his wife when he woke up in a US Army hospital after running over a land mine). He went to work as an engineer for the USAF and for a while was assigned to a base in Europe. He drove into Poland to see what things were like and found that the people in the villages walking back from church would not get out of the road. They knew that the only person driving a car had to be a "Communist Party SOB." Then once he got past them would see the US flag on he back of his car and would mob him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Similar threads

85 years ago today, Sept 1 1939, the second world war began.
Replies
1
Views
433
MIflyer
M
Favorite "obscure" theater or World War II to research?
Replies
9
Views
1K
EwenS
E
Season’s Greetings from Air War Publications.
Replies
0
Views
45
Snautzer01
From WW2 Bachem's Ba 349 Natter (Viper), to the cold war
Replies
1
Views
504
Gnomey
The Rise and Fall of the Nazi War Machine
Replies
5
Views
1K
pbehn
P
Menu
Log in
Register