- Thread starter
-
- #21
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Just a thought on this, I certainly don't know if some or all or most were or weren't although I would guess that as with most things in history the truth is not always so cut and dried one way or the other but having said that regardless of whether he is correct people aught not be calling for his dismissal on the grounds of what he believes to be true.Ryu Seok-chun(류석춘), a sociology professor at Yonsei University in Seoul, is requested dismissal by Yonsei's students and graduates because he has lectured "Comfort women were prostitutes" in his class on the 19th. Education is a double‐edged sword.
Ryu Seok-chun
View attachment 553829
Source: 연세대 총학-동문들 "위안부 매춘 망언 류석춘 교수 파면하라"
Ryu Seok-chun(류석춘), a sociology professor at Yonsei University in Seoul, is requested dismissal by Yonsei's students and graduates because he has lectured "Comfort women were prostitutes" in his class on the 19th.
An educated and progressive thinking Nisei friend of the family once said about this controversy: "A prostitute is essentially a capitalist in a free market working for financial gain; a comfort woman is essentially a prisoner doing forced labor. There's a moral difference."I certainly don't know if some or all or most were or weren't although I would guess that as with most things in history the truth is not always so cut and dried one way or the other
I absolutely agree there is a huge moral difference. Did you somehow get the impression from my post I was equating the two?An educated and progressive thinking Nisei friend of the family once said about this controversy: "A prostitute is essentially a capitalist in a free market working for financial gain; a comfort woman is essentially a prisoner doing forced labor. There's a moral difference."
According to my Nisei friend (who certainly was in a position to know more about it than I ever will), these "comfort homes" were little more than thinly disguised slave labor camps, with the inmates fed rations and issued clothing and personal effects and denied individual property. I'm sure there were local differences due to different command procedures and attitudes.".... There's a moral difference."
Indeed there is, but there is also the presence or absence of money. Were comfort women paid? Were they paid by the 'army'? Were they paid on the basis of piece-work, or a monthly stipend?
No, I was trying to clarify the point to some of the more morally rigid who might read this thread.I absolutely agree there is a huge moral difference. Did you somehow get the impression from my post I was equating the two?