N4521U
Colonel
Ditto!
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Ditto!This is a good idea for reference purposes.
That being said my main area of expertise has no real relevance to the forum…
I think the real question would be how and who will determine if someone is expert enough to be called an expert. If we don't do that carefully we'll probably get in all kinds of trouble.So I thought maybe to simply edit my intro thread to add the names of people we could ID as the experts. If any of these folks object to being identified as such, I would simply remove the name.
Michael Hope (Propellers) and Engineman (WW2 Engines) would be examples. I could throw my name in for the DH Mosquito too but it's more on the technical side.
So I thought maybe to simply edit my intro thread to add the names of people we could ID as the experts. If any of these folks object to being identified as such, I would simply remove the name.
Michael Hope (Propellers) and Engineman (WW2 Engines) would be examples. I could throw my name in for the DH Mosquito too but it's more on the technical side.
I think the real question would be how and who will determine if someone is expert enough to be called an expert. If we don't do that carefully we'll probably get in all kinds of trouble.
For instance, I remember someone who thought he was an expert on P39s and there were probably some who believed that
"Expert" may not be the right word. While there are no doubt some true experts here, the intent was more to identify "go to" people for certain subjects.I think the real question would be how and who will determine if someone is expert enough to be called an expert.
He was, however, a gentleman. He never posted maliciously despite much written abuse sent his way.I think the real question would be how and who will determine if someone is expert enough to be called an expert. If we don't do that carefully we'll probably get in all kinds of trouble.
For instance, I remember someone who thought he was an expert on P39s and there were probably some who believed that
Bite yer tongue!!!!!!!!!There was also the P-40 thread, though the P-39 thread did take the lead.
There is a difference between those that are authorative in their field and those that self-proclaim.
Like "Go to""Expert" may not be the right word. While there are no doubt some true experts here, the intent was more to identify "go to" people for certain subjects.
Member nominations would be fairest.I think the real question would be how and who will determine if someone is expert enough to be called an expert. If we don't do that carefully we'll probably get in all kinds of trouble.
For instance, I remember someone who thought he was an expert on P39s and there were probably some who believed that
Like a poll for each category, perhaps?Member nominations would be fairest.
A bit more context.much written abuse
I agree. Would be nice to organise this.Member nominations would be fairest.
Basically someone responding to keep the stuff up to date.What's a data owner and what does it entail. It's sounding more complicated than I intended it to be.