Meanwhile downunder...

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Well, before you judge let's remember:
1, He was born and raised and lived in OZ
2. He's a male
3. He was born and raised and lived in OZ
4. He was a TEENAGE male
5. He was born and raised and lived in OZ
6. His testosterone blood levels were 10 times normal
7. He was born and raised and lived in OZ
8. Most of his blood had been diverted to his small head
9. He was born and raised and lived in OZ
10. The male small head does not think very well if at all
11. He was born and raised and lived in OZ
12. She was FEMALE
13. And lastly, He was born and raised and lived in OZ
 
Of the 413 Darwin Award nominations, 332 were independently verified and confirmed by the Darwin Awards Committee. Of these, 14 were shared by male and female nominees—usually overly adventurous couples in compromising positions—leaving 318 valid cases for statistical testing. Of these 318 cases, 282 Darwin Awards were awarded to males and just 36 awards given to females. There is a marked sex difference in Darwin Award winners. Males thus made up 88.7% of Darwin Award winners, and this sex difference is highly statistically significant.

 
Very true! It is significant that the male reaches his sexual peak in his late teens, this allows time for most of the would be Darwin award winners to weed themselves out of the gene pool prior to passing their genes on.
 

Users who are viewing this thread