FLYBOYJ
"THE GREAT GAZOO"
AMEN!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Udet said:War against China?
It is likely to happen. After all, wars are not waged for the fun of killing. Killing is just a mean never the ultimate goal.
The ultimate goal of war is economic-political power.
In view of the economic growth of China and the overall financial position of other powers, USA or course included, it could happen.
The USA and allies, for instance, did not invade Irak to implement democracy. It is a tale no one on earth buys, but let´s not forget politicians know how to chump on garbage -they are proffesionals at it-. They will continue to repeat their rubbish for as many times possible to convert lies into truth.
I hardly watch any TV, however, and by a mere coincidence I happened to be near a screen showing Sir Tony "Trafalgar Square Punk" Blair being interviewed. With a great smile on his face, his reponse to some question regarding the aftermath of the invasion of Irak was:
"Let´s not forget that present-day Iraki citizens have the absolute freedom of will and liberty to take the paper, chose their preferred politician and to deposit their vote in the box."
Yes, sure that might be happening now in Irak.
Still, this individual, the expression on his face lacked any authenticity. He sounded so untrue, so false and so pretending i found the view completely obscene.
Sure. Sure Mr. Blair had countless sleepless nights worrying on the absence of democracy in Irak.
Scene: At Mr. Blair´s residence, some night well before the invasion of Irak:
His wife, noticing some noise in the bedroom, opens lazy eyes, reaches out for her husband, but he is not in the bed. Turning the lights on, she sees her husband standing still looking through the window.
"Dear? It is 3 a.m. and you are not asleep? What is wrong?"
Worried Tony responds:
"Just to have the view in my mind of those poor people of Irak... they can not vote for God´s sake! I will never rest until i see them voting in freedom".
Laughable or upsetting, or both.
Now a China-USA military clash...let´s hope it never happens.
I ve been told most people in the USA army, when the Vietnam conflict was at its initial stages called the Vietnamese "rice chumping apes wearing black pijamas". In the end, the USA army fled Vietnam with the tail between the legs.
China is the kind of regime where high casualties would not be that relevant. The USA, loyal to a long tradition, does not tolerate casualties nowhere near the "moderate" range.
China has a large army, their soldiers are well trained and equipped: jets, heavy tanks, artillery, missiles, etc.
The sole similarity present-day Chinese soldiers could share with those Vietnamese who fought against the USA in the 60s would be the absolute fierceness in combat and utter commitment to annihilate the enemy.
You might immediately burst out to point out the fact Chinese military technology can be still well behind the USA´s.
I would not be so sure on that particular issue. China has been sending "armies" or fleets of spies to roll across the earth; most countries have them, either first world or developing nations, to steal all kinds of "know-how" on virtually every matter you can think of. The mission is to gather, record and steal all classified information they can get their hands on.
And they have been trained to make things happen. Trained to get their hands on almost anything.
Military technology, of course, is a relevant target of those fleets of Chinese spies rolling across the earth.
evengilder said:Good thought, trackend. I have often thought that veterans should form their own political party. While there are liberal and conservative veterans, they would at least know that the military option is the last one and once unleashed, they should be allowed to fight as they should without intervention. I'm not talking about a fair fight either, I am talking about an overwhelming force. Get it done, then bring them home. Veterans know that the decision to send troops into the danger zone will cost lives and will think long and hard before doing it.
FLYBOYJ said:Thank you Track! - Its a shame when politicians of any nation ask soldiers to fight, put almost impossible restrictions on them, and then have the same soldiers take the wrath of the media or from other "critics" for not completing the mission.
DerAdlerIstGelandet said:This one is deffinatly going to be interesting how it panns out. As for the Japanese cabinate going to the memorial for Japanese soldiers of WW2. As long as they were going to pay respect to the fallen I see no problem with that. No fallen soldier should be forgotten, well unless they were convicted of atrocities and then in my opinion they are monsters not soldiers. However if the visit was meant for other reasons then the cabinet was wrong and is not respecting them but dishonoring them.
I've noticed that too. They never seem to forget their living veterans either.DerAdlerIstGelandet said:I actually find that a lot of the communist countries or former ones such as the Soviet Union actually made some of the best monuments to there soldiers.