Most Unattractive Aircraft of WW2

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

View attachment 505782
Vickers Wellesley was no beauty. Surprisingly ungainly
Given its massive span, I'd like to see how it's designers could create a FAA variant to fit down Ark Royal's 45ft by 22ft and 45ft by 25ft lifts. At 39 ft 3 in long, we're okay on lift length.

If we fold the wings just outside the undercarriage, will it be less than 22ft wide? But can the geodetic wing structure be cut? And what of those under wing pods?

 
Last edited:
Can the wing be lifted and lowered as it passes the tower, as if saluting the captain?
 

Like this maybe? Gannet AEW3
 
Not seen very well in the cutaway above, but there are 132 gallons of fuel in tanks midway in each wing.
Why would you want a Wellesely on an aircraft carrier?

 
Not seen very well in the cutaway above, but there are 132 gallons of fuel in tanks midway in each wing.
Why would you want a Wellesely on an aircraft carrier?

I don't but some people seem to delight in putting square pegs in round holes

extra long range but extra large aircraft that cut down on the carriers number of aircraft carried and that need gobs more work to make ready or strike down seem to be a very poor bargain indeed.
 

Users who are viewing this thread