Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Years too late. The israeli court should have convicted him.
Well, glad they finally got the guy, just wished it had been during Nuremburg, maybe he could've gotten the death penalty then. Do they still have a death penalty in Germany, or has it been abolished?
What's wrong w/ bread and water and hard labor for life? Not exactly in this case, but in general?
Werner von Braun were also responsible for killing persons for his rocket program and afterwards he was brought to the States and no one called for a trial ( is there a difference between useful and not useful criminals )
You called for Nuremburg. From the legal point of view this trial was illegal, because the rules and the paragraphs were made after the crimes and in roman law there is a rule which is learned by every student in th first semester at university " nulla poena sine lege " ( no punishment without existing law).
Otherwise we can say only the victor can say whats right or wrong and than its illegal under the point of legal focus.
V.
If he will be sent to germany he will get his trial. If he will be sent to prison thas another question.
VI.
And if we are talking by crimes done during war times, we have the ICJ in The Hague which is still waiting for some US citizens, because they wont be punished in the States.
The US is not a signatory to that court, therefore it has no jurisdiction. And numerous legl scholars around the world have said that individuals wanting redress from the US must use the US courts as they have been historically independant from most political matters.
Are you actually serious? If your caught up in the lack of laws regarding some of the heinous acts committed, you have must exist in a theoretical dreamworld that is completely disconnected from reality. Put down the textbook!II.
You called for Nuremburg. From the legal point of view this trial was illegal, because the rules and the paragraphs were made after the crimes and in roman law there is a rule which is learned by every student in th first semester at university " nulla poena sine lege " ( no punishment without existing law).
Otherwise we can say only the victor can say whats right or wrong and than its illegal under the point of legal focus.
VI.
And if we are talking by crimes done during war times, we have the ICJ in The Hague which is still waiting for some US citizens, because they wont be punished in the States.
Just for my clarification (an believe me, I'm no expert by a long shot), isn't it true that the highest judges in the USA are appointed by the president? How could they be political independent in that case?