B-17engineer
Colonel
True but if you have an enemy, who has just been terribly defeated and are still trying to figure out what just happened, doesn't make sense to go in pursuit?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Let me get this straight.
The original claim states:
"Towards the end of battle, Montgomery held a press conference, broadcast throughout Britain by the BBC, in which he announced that he had led the British Army to the victory and had saved the day for the Americans. The British press used banner headlines to report that Monty had rescued the Americans from certain defeat
and it is accepted as gospel. The claims said to have been made at this press confrence are considered good enough to condem Monty for:
"announcing that he had led the British Army to the victory and had saved the day for the Americans.....
and demeaning the battle quality of the American soldier"
However when I post a US report of this press confrence it is now claimed that:
"Do you really believe everything that is said when someone calls a Press Conference
Double standards at work here.
I ask again where is the transcript of the press conference where Monty disparaged the American soldier?
But only if they reflect badly on Monty?
When the enemy are on the back foot as they were after Alamein it could be argued that by only launching his men in pursuit when he was sure of victory you will ensure that the victory would not be decisive.
Instead of pointing out that the original claim is bunk cause its from a press conference, you counter it with more bunk, another press conference, and cite it as evidence.
The AP press report directly contradicts the claim that:I think it's kinda a funny... an attempt to be academic by quoting staged press conferences... the press conferences aren't even worth bringing up unless the topic is about Public Relations and the Military.
But was the British Ar,y capable of going on the attack after the battle? They took some heavy losses too. Sometimes, its better not to bite off more than you can chew.
Patton-- he knew the value of co-ordination of air support to all the group-based units in his Army group: armor, artillery, infantry, engineers, and the HQ group- Patton relied on intelligence his G-3 Col. Oscar Koch had predicted the German Dec. attack (1944) back in Oct.-- Rommel did not have the G-3 sector in the same depth of information (US could read the Ultra messages)-and Patton knew how to use intel to his advantage. But on a scale of 1 to 10, Patton gets a 9.5, Rommel an 8-IMO anyway.Who was the better tactician?
MacArthur vs. Patton--Well, Patton was never pulled out of a TO by FDR-as was Mac-- Patton was side-lined by Ike-after the slappings in Sicily--and strange, the German OKH Offizers could not understand that action by Ike-- in their command experiences, slapping an enlisted man was not unusual, if needed to restore disciple to the command. In our Armed Forces, that has always been a grey area-- Boot camp discipline, with a DI or other senior Non Com "shaping up a raw recruit"-- usually not done in open sight.Patton had strengths that ought not be scofed at. He pulled an army that had been thoroughly defeated and put it back together. His ideas on armoured brekthrough were very progressive.
However, he was not as well developed in thinking as Rommel in terms of the all arms concepts, plus Rommel got an awful lot out of inferior troops (the italians). Conversely, Rommels logistics capabilities were limited, to put it mildly.
Both Generals were also fairly limited when it came to fighting as part of a coalition....both tended to worry only about their own "fronts". Compared to a Mountbatten or a Macarthur, there was no comparison, both these guys were rank amateurs, and in the case of Rommel, very much the product of the system that trained him....
Its not as clear cut as people think....
Monty's press confrence:
Teamwork Stopped Huns: Monty
By the Associated Press.
Twenty-first army group headquarters, Jan. 8—Field Marshal Sir Bernard L. Montgomery Sunday said Allied team work and especially the inherent "courage and good fighting quality" of American troops has halted the German drive into Belgium.
The battle is "far from over," he asserted, but the Germans "have been halted, then sealed off, and we are now in the process of writing them off," with the initiative in Allied hands.
At his first press conference in months, the colorful Briton, commanding four armies north of the German bulge told how Field Marshal Karl von Rundstedt's thrust developed, and how he moved to meet it.
Time and again he stressed that above all it was the fighting ability of American doughboys and their "tenacity in battle that makes a great soldier" that has really saved the situation by the stands at St. Vith, Bastogne, and south of Monschau.
He singled out two American armored divisions, the 2d and 7th, and two United States airborne division, the 82d and 101st, and the 106th infantry as doing a great job. He also lauded the United States 7th corps, and praised Gen. Dwight Eisenhower's leadership.
"What was Von Rundstedt trying to achieve? I don't know," Marshal Montgomery said in an hour-long talk. "The only guide we have is his order of the day which told his soldiers they must go all out on this last big effort.
"One must admit that he has dealt a sharp blow and he has sent us reeling back, but we recovered and he has been unable to gain any great advantage. He has therefore failed in his strategic purpose, unless the prize is smaller than his men were told.
"Von Rundstedt attacked on December 16," he said. "He obtained a tactical surprise. He drove a deep wedge into the center of the 1st army and split American forces in two. The situation loomed as if it might become awkward. The Germans had broken right through the spot and were heading for the Meuse.
"As soon as I saw what was happening, I took certain steps myself to insure that if the Germans got to the Meuse they could certainly not get over that river. And I carried out certain movements so as to provide balanced dispositions to meet the threatened danger."
Marshal Montgomery at the time had command only of the British 2d and Canadian 1st armies, and on his own he shifted some troops south to meet the threat.
"Then the situation began to deteriorate, but the whole Allied team rallied to meet the danger. National considerations were thrown overboard; General Eisenhower placed me in command of the whole northern front."
"I employed the whole available power of the British group of armies. This power was brought into play very gradually and in such a way that it would not interfere with American lines of communications. Finally it was put into battle with a bang, and today British divisions are fighting hard on the right flank of the United States 1st army . . This is a fine Allied picture.
"We have halted the Germans, sealed them off, and are now writing them off. German divisions have suffered heavily, but I say this about a battle. It is a very great mistake to think it is over. The worst parts are over, but a great deal more must be done.
"There are two main reasons why Von Rundstedt was sealed off from achieving what he was after, The first of these is the good fighting qualities of the United States soldier, and the second is Allied teamwork.
"I formed a very high opinion of the American soldier in Italy and Sicily," Marshal Montgomery continued earnestly. "I have spent my life with the British soldier and I love the British soldier, but I have formed a great affection for the American soldier, who is a very brave fighting man who has that tenacity in battle which makes a great soldier.
"He is basically responsible for stopping Von Rundstedt from what he set out to do. "He held out at Elsenborn there south of Monschau (the 1st, 2d, 99th and 30th infantry divisions) when the great blow hit him and he stopped those SS panzer divisions.
"At St. Vith many United States troops were cut off and isolated but in little groups they fought and held on to those vital road junctions, forcing the Germans to halt. It was a very fine performance that the 7th armored division and the 106th infantry division borne division at Bastogne which put up a great performance.
"On December 20-21, I consulted General Hodges (Lieut. Gen. Courtney Hodges, United States 1st army commander) and suggested we must get those fine fighting men out of the St. Vith area and back in our lines
"The 82d American airborne division moved forward and got in contact with these elements and we pulled them back behind our lines. Then we ordered the 82d back to better positions but they did not want to come and they protested, but I assured them they had accomplished their mission and could withdraw with honor.
"I take my hat off willingly to such men."
Discussing Allied teamwork, Marshal Montgomery said, "It was to me a remarkable thing how in the time of danger the Allied team rallied together. This thing of Allied solidarity is terribly important. Teamwork wins battles and battle victories win wars.
"On our team the captain is General Ike. I am devoted to him. We are great friends. We are all in this fight together and we must not allow any wedges to be driven between us. As an illustration of our friendship, the other day my plane was damaged, and I asked Ike for another, and he sent his own at once."
In questions after the conference, Marshal Montgomery said the Germans still were "fine soldiers" and formidable enemies. He cited the January 1 attack of the Luftwaffe on Allied airfields as an example of German potentialities, saying "the enemy pulled a fast one on us."
But this does not mean the German has air superiority, he continued, and "the biggest terror of the German soldier is our air force. On good days they shoot up everything behind the German lines."
The field marshal, in contrast with his press conferences last summer, declined to go into any predictions as to how long the war would last, or to estimate German capabilities.
But "in the balance, I don't see how Von Rundstedt has gained very much." he said
Can anyone point to where Monty can be said to be 'demeaning the battle quality of the American soldier' or claiming he 'rescued the Americans from certain defeat'[/QUOTE
Monty's press confrence:
Teamwork Stopped Huns: Monty
By the Associated Press.
Twenty-first army group headquarters, Jan. 8—Field Marshal Sir Bernard L. Montgomery Sunday said Allied team work and especially the inherent "courage and good fighting quality" of American troops has halted the German drive into Belgium.
The battle is "far from over," he asserted, but the Germans "have been halted, then sealed off, and we are now in the process of writing them off," with the initiative in Allied hands.
At his first press conference in months, the colorful Briton, commanding four armies north of the German bulge told how Field Marshal Karl von Rundstedt's thrust developed, and how he moved to meet it.
Time and again he stressed that above all it was the fighting ability of American doughboys and their "tenacity in battle that makes a great soldier" that has really saved the situation by the stands at St. Vith, Bastogne, and south of Monschau.
He singled out two American armored divisions, the 2d and 7th, and two United States airborne division, the 82d and 101st, and the 106th infantry as doing a great job. He also lauded the United States 7th corps, and praised Gen. Dwight Eisenhower's leadership.
"What was Von Rundstedt trying to achieve? I don't know," Marshal Montgomery said in an hour-long talk. "The only guide we have is his order of the day which told his soldiers they must go all out on this last big effort.
"One must admit that he has dealt a sharp blow and he has sent us reeling back, but we recovered and he has been unable to gain any great advantage. He has therefore failed in his strategic purpose, unless the prize is smaller than his men were told.
"Von Rundstedt attacked on December 16," he said. "He obtained a tactical surprise. He drove a deep wedge into the center of the 1st army and split American forces in two. The situation loomed as if it might become awkward. The Germans had broken right through the spot and were heading for the Meuse.
"As soon as I saw what was happening, I took certain steps myself to insure that if the Germans got to the Meuse they could certainly not get over that river. And I carried out certain movements so as to provide balanced dispositions to meet the threatened danger."
Marshal Montgomery at the time had command only of the British 2d and Canadian 1st armies, and on his own he shifted some troops south to meet the threat.
"Then the situation began to deteriorate, but the whole Allied team rallied to meet the danger. National considerations were thrown overboard; General Eisenhower placed me in command of the whole northern front."
"I employed the whole available power of the British group of armies. This power was brought into play very gradually and in such a way that it would not interfere with American lines of communications. Finally it was put into battle with a bang, and today British divisions are fighting hard on the right flank of the United States 1st army . . This is a fine Allied picture.
"We have halted the Germans, sealed them off, and are now writing them off. German divisions have suffered heavily, but I say this about a battle. It is a very great mistake to think it is over. The worst parts are over, but a great deal more must be done.
"There are two main reasons why Von Rundstedt was sealed off from achieving what he was after, The first of these is the good fighting qualities of the United States soldier, and the second is Allied teamwork.
"I formed a very high opinion of the American soldier in Italy and Sicily," Marshal Montgomery continued earnestly. "I have spent my life with the British soldier and I love the British soldier, but I have formed a great affection for the American soldier, who is a very brave fighting man who has that tenacity in battle which makes a great soldier.
"He is basically responsible for stopping Von Rundstedt from what he set out to do. "He held out at Elsenborn there south of Monschau (the 1st, 2d, 99th and 30th infantry divisions) when the great blow hit him and he stopped those SS panzer divisions.
"At St. Vith many United States troops were cut off and isolated but in little groups they fought and held on to those vital road junctions, forcing the Germans to halt. It was a very fine performance that the 7th armored division and the 106th infantry division borne division at Bastogne which put up a great performance.
"On December 20-21, I consulted General Hodges (Lieut. Gen. Courtney Hodges, United States 1st army commander) and suggested we must get those fine fighting men out of the St. Vith area and back in our lines
"The 82d American airborne division moved forward and got in contact with these elements and we pulled them back behind our lines. Then we ordered the 82d back to better positions but they did not want to come and they protested, but I assured them they had accomplished their mission and could withdraw with honor.
"I take my hat off willingly to such men."
Discussing Allied teamwork, Marshal Montgomery said, "It was to me a remarkable thing how in the time of danger the Allied team rallied together. This thing of Allied solidarity is terribly important. Teamwork wins battles and battle victories win wars.
"On our team the captain is General Ike. I am devoted to him. We are great friends. We are all in this fight together and we must not allow any wedges to be driven between us. As an illustration of our friendship, the other day my plane was damaged, and I asked Ike for another, and he sent his own at once."
In questions after the conference, Marshal Montgomery said the Germans still were "fine soldiers" and formidable enemies. He cited the January 1 attack of the Luftwaffe on Allied airfields as an example of German potentialities, saying "the enemy pulled a fast one on us."
But this does not mean the German has air superiority, he continued, and "the biggest terror of the German soldier is our air force. On good days they shoot up everything behind the German lines."
The field marshal, in contrast with his press conferences last summer, declined to go into any predictions as to how long the war would last, or to estimate German capabilities.
But "in the balance, I don't see how Von Rundstedt has gained very much." he said
Can anyone point to where Monty can be said to be 'demeaning the battle quality of the American soldier' or claiming he 'rescued the Americans from certain defeat'
Monty's press confrence:
Teamwork Stopped Huns: Monty
By the Associated Press.
Twenty-first army group headquarters, Jan. 8—Field Marshal Sir Bernard L. Montgomery Sunday said Allied team work and especially the inherent "courage and good fighting quality" of American troops has halted the German drive into Belgium.
The battle is "far from over," he asserted, but the Germans "have been halted, then sealed off, and we are now in the process of writing them off," with the initiative in Allied hands.
At his first press conference in months, the colorful Briton, commanding four armies north of the German bulge told how Field Marshal Karl von Rundstedt's thrust developed, and how he moved to meet it.
Time and again he stressed that above all it was the fighting ability of American doughboys and their "tenacity in battle that makes a great soldier" that has really saved the situation by the stands at St. Vith, Bastogne, and south of Monschau.
He singled out two American armored divisions, the 2d and 7th, and two United States airborne division, the 82d and 101st, and the 106th infantry as doing a great job. He also lauded the United States 7th corps, and praised Gen. Dwight Eisenhower's leadership.
"What was Von Rundstedt trying to achieve? I don't know," Marshal Montgomery said in an hour-long talk. "The only guide we have is his order of the day which told his soldiers they must go all out on this last big effort.
"One must admit that he has dealt a sharp blow and he has sent us reeling back, but we recovered and he has been unable to gain any great advantage. He has therefore failed in his strategic purpose, unless the prize is smaller than his men were told.
"Von Rundstedt attacked on December 16," he said. "He obtained a tactical surprise. He drove a deep wedge into the center of the 1st army and split American forces in two. The situation loomed as if it might become awkward. The Germans had broken right through the spot and were heading for the Meuse.
"As soon as I saw what was happening, I took certain steps myself to insure that if the Germans got to the Meuse they could certainly not get over that river. And I carried out certain movements so as to provide balanced dispositions to meet the threatened danger."
Marshal Montgomery at the time had command only of the British 2d and Canadian 1st armies, and on his own he shifted some troops south to meet the threat.
"Then the situation began to deteriorate, but the whole Allied team rallied to meet the danger. National considerations were thrown overboard; General Eisenhower placed me in command of the whole northern front."
"I employed the whole available power of the British group of armies. This power was brought into play very gradually and in such a way that it would not interfere with American lines of communications. Finally it was put into battle with a bang, and today British divisions are fighting hard on the right flank of the United States 1st army . . This is a fine Allied picture.
"We have halted the Germans, sealed them off, and are now writing them off. German divisions have suffered heavily, but I say this about a battle. It is a very great mistake to think it is over. The worst parts are over, but a great deal more must be done.
"There are two main reasons why Von Rundstedt was sealed off from achieving what he was after, The first of these is the good fighting qualities of the United States soldier, and the second is Allied teamwork.
"I formed a very high opinion of the American soldier in Italy and Sicily," Marshal Montgomery continued earnestly. "I have spent my life with the British soldier and I love the British soldier, but I have formed a great affection for the American soldier, who is a very brave fighting man who has that tenacity in battle which makes a great soldier.
"He is basically responsible for stopping Von Rundstedt from what he set out to do. "He held out at Elsenborn there south of Monschau (the 1st, 2d, 99th and 30th infantry divisions) when the great blow hit him and he stopped those SS panzer divisions.
"At St. Vith many United States troops were cut off and isolated but in little groups they fought and held on to those vital road junctions, forcing the Germans to halt. It was a very fine performance that the 7th armored division and the 106th infantry division borne division at Bastogne which put up a great performance.
"On December 20-21, I consulted General Hodges (Lieut. Gen. Courtney Hodges, United States 1st army commander) and suggested we must get those fine fighting men out of the St. Vith area and back in our lines
"The 82d American airborne division moved forward and got in contact with these elements and we pulled them back behind our lines. Then we ordered the 82d back to better positions but they did not want to come and they protested, but I assured them they had accomplished their mission and could withdraw with honor.
"I take my hat off willingly to such men."
Discussing Allied teamwork, Marshal Montgomery said, "It was to me a remarkable thing how in the time of danger the Allied team rallied together. This thing of Allied solidarity is terribly important. Teamwork wins battles and battle victories win wars.
"On our team the captain is General Ike. I am devoted to him. We are great friends. We are all in this fight together and we must not allow any wedges to be driven between us. As an illustration of our friendship, the other day my plane was damaged, and I asked Ike for another, and he sent his own at once."
In questions after the conference, Marshal Montgomery said the Germans still were "fine soldiers" and formidable enemies. He cited the January 1 attack of the Luftwaffe on Allied airfields as an example of German potentialities, saying "the enemy pulled a fast one on us."
But this does not mean the German has air superiority, he continued, and "the biggest terror of the German soldier is our air force. On good days they shoot up everything behind the German lines."
The field marshal, in contrast with his press conferences last summer, declined to go into any predictions as to how long the war would last, or to estimate German capabilities.
But "in the balance, I don't see how Von Rundstedt has gained very much." he said
Can anyone point to where Monty can be said to be 'demeaning the battle quality of the American soldier' or claiming he 'rescued the Americans from certain defeat'[
In Carlo D'Este's great book: "Patton, A Genius For War" he details how Patton's troops obtained gasoline for their tank advances to the Siegfried line--Ike had cut off the gasoline supply to Patton's Third Army, in order to support Montgomery's "Market Garden" operation. Great reading, shows how "creative" Patton's troops were in a combat scenario- IMO, way better than the troops commanded by either Mark Clark or Omar Bradley.Who do you think is the more over rated of the two? Did Patton ever have to deal with low supplies to the point where we would get a good idea on how he would perform in this situation?
Actually Market Garden was a response to the fuel shortage, not the cause of it.In Carlo D'Este's great book: "Patton, A Genius For War" he details how Patton's troops obtained gasoline for their tank advances to the Siegfried line--Ike had cut off the gasoline supply to Patton's Third Army, in order to support Montgomery's "Market Garden" operation. Great reading, shows how "creative" Patton's troops were in a combat scenario- IMO, way better than the troops commanded by either Mark Clark or Omar Bradley.
Market Garden most likely cost the Allies, with Bernard Montgomery's flawed plan, more in wasted fuel, than had Ike dis-approved "Monty's OP"-- and gave Patton's 3rd. Army the fuel and ammo to punch through the Seigfreid Line and on into Berlin- As "Monty" proved in Africa, Sicily and later after D-Day with his slow paced and possibly over-cautious advancement through the German lines, his delays gave the Germans an opportunity to retreat and re-group and counter-attack.Actually Market Garden was a response to the fuel shortage, not the cause of it.
US units were already running out of fuel due to the 'broad front' advance ordered by Ike, Market Garden was ordered because it was a way to keep the advance going without placing too much further strain on the fuel supplies in France.