Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Piss on that, I woulda had that prick on the floor with a broken arm and a shattered sternum in 4 seconds....
That Vet shoulda got up with the blood streamin off his head and punched the first onlooker right in the mush.... Fuc*in cowards....
Judge Mushtaq Khokhar at Minshull Street Crown Court, Manchester, awarded Mr Bannister £200 for his 'great public-spiritedness.'
True enough VZ, but to stand there and do nothing is just pathetic, and I hope all those 9 guys that stood there all felt some guilt at being such pussies....
Hey, don't worryOver here Mr. Bannister would have been charged with creating a public nuisance.
Hey, don't worry
we're not far behind you; one Tony Martin spent time inside for blowing a thief away when two of them broke into his home. They made him do the full term because he refused to show any contrition for his 'crime'.
There's a growing sentiment over here that the judicial system protects the guilty and punishes the victim if he has the pluck to hit back.
I don't recallWell I'm sure if that happened in Berkely, California, there would have been an uproar against Mr. Bannister. Colin, what was the charge against Tony Martin?
I don't recall
but likely manslaughter, I don't know what you guys call it but 'not quite murder'; they reasoned his response was excessive. Though he wasn't a pensioner, Mr Martin wasn't a young man and a couple of thugs breaking into his home was probably quite intimidating.
They pictured the two thugs during the trial, including the dead one - believe me, he did the gene pool a favour.
Those 9 asshats probably didn't jump in to help Mr. Bannister because they had soiled themselves...
Society has become nothing but sheep this day and age, and that's when the wolves come out...
Yeah, I remember that...what a load of crap...
If the guy didn't try and help, then he'd probably have been sued for not helping!
The idiots that sue for personal "damages" don't understand that the people and companies they sue have to get the money from somewhere...so it's not "magical" money pulled off a tree somewhere, but ends up coming out of consumer's pockets in the form of increased insurance rates or product price hikes, etc...
No matter, I'd have still come to Mr. Bannister's aid, and then sort the details later.
That's bullshit! He protects himself and his property from two thugs, and he was the one imprisoned!!!??
They made him do the full term because he refused to show any contrition for his 'crime'.
That wasn't the case with Tony Martin.
He was tried, and convicted, for murder. It was finally reduced to manslaughter on appeal because doctors convinced the court he suffered from paranoia so wasn't fully responsible for his actions.
Martin had a history. He fired a revolver in to his girlfriend's house many years earlier when she refused to see him. He lost his shotgun licence after shooting at someone who had taken some apples from his tree.
The reasons Martin was convicted of murder:
He had frequently told people of his hatred of gypsies, and how he'd like to kill them. (the burglars were gypsies)
After shooting them, he left the scene, hid the shotgun at his mother's house, then checked in to a hotel for the night. He didn't inform the police.
When questioned by the police, he lied about the events. He claimed to have fired from the top of the stairs. Ballistics evidence showed he come down stairs, chased after the burglars, and shot them in the back as they ran away.
Martin is often held up as the poster boy for self defence, but what he did doesn't fit under the category of self defence. He decided to punish burglars by killing them, which is a different thing altogether.
Martin was released after serving 3 years. His original life sentence for murder had been reduced to 5 years for manslaughter.