Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
supposedly there are some examples, very rare,
Drgondog, I think that the posts belong to another thread, don't they?
Bill I think Willi may have talked of the whole November 26, 1944 mission not just his role and his JG 301 at once. looking at the numbers overall for the Luftwaffe, they came up and simply got slaughtered. of course you and I have filled gaps in where Neil and I left off and am still working on what happened from the JG 301 closer first hand than Willi has done in his first person book. Obviously there will always be many unanswered questions.
E ~
well lets say the thread although modeling is about my cousins a/c Bill and he fought and died in the attack thread you and I are mentioning. true a saturation of one bomb group to destroy and de-moralize the associated groups was clear cut wishful thinking, but that was the idea from a staffel of 10 to 15 a/c lined up and then breaking off into 3's with a dagger like attack with element leader in front followed by the remaining two. bu through all accts so far from your 355th/2nd SF and from my correspondance with the 339th fg rep, JG 301 was caught in most cases flying in-line abreast in large numbers far from the bombers and were attacked and jumped while trying to form up a Sturm style attack befitting a typical rear assault
Personally I do not think JG 1 or JG 6 had any kills over B-24's but were dealing with leading boxes of B-17's. It is already proven that the 491st and 445th was hit by the JG 301 Fw's and the leading B-24 group 381st ? received no downed Libs.
To get that last bit straight in my head, ur saying the LW lost 83+ fighters out of 120 that attacked, and that the 8th AF lost 5?????????
Were all those losses to fighter opposistion Bill, or is it combined??? U kinda lost me...
Drgondog, Heinz got the 'I'll trade U 4 that' thread up and running again. If there's anything you want to sell or swap, drop a post on the thread!
Matt, Erich and Wurger are correct, when I say supposedly, this is because there IS written reference in various books and sites that some DID have the Ta tail, however WE collectively haven't seen photographic evidence yet! Maybe there is, maybe there isn't......
In one Kagero publication it states next to one photo that this crashed A-9 may have the Ta tail, well guess what you can't see the tail!.....?
Matt if you wish to have a go at one, please do, it would make a great "what if" subject to see!