Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
However, twin-engined aircraft were not favoured for carrier operations because single-engined landings (and especially wave-off's) were considered rather dangerous.
If I remember correctly, the plan to use the Mosquito as a carrier aircraft was shelved because of this.
The Mosquito was the first twin-engined aircraft to land on an aircraft carrier, the HMS Indefatigable on March 25 1944 by Lt. Eric Brown...
It was eventually developed into the carrier capable Sea Mosquito TR MK 33, but as you stated it never served on a carrier. Ray Williams in his book, FLY NAVY, states;
"Although the aircraft had been cleared for carrier operation, there is no record of No.811 Squadrons Sea Mosquitos ever going to sea".
Not a lot of reasons are given, but as you say, it was considered a very large aircraft and required RATO if it was to take off at maximum weight.
Twin engine Douglas T2D's convertible wheel/float torpedo bombers conducted landing trials aboard USS Langley in 1927.The Mosquito was the first twin-engined aircraft to land on an aircraft carrier, the HMS Indefatigable on March 25 1944 by Lt. Eric Brown...
The Grumman twin was the F7F not F8F. I can't imagine why the USN would want any AC like the Firefly. It could not carry as big a bomb load as the Corsair or Hellcat and it was too slow and unmaneuverable to be a fighter. The F4U1P was used for photo reconnaissance in WW2. Much safer for that job than a Firefly. One reason the USN in WW2 would not use twins was they took up too much room.
Just read an interesting story related by Thomas Moorer who was a young pilot of a PBY at PH. Later he became CNO. He said that in order to conduct a 360 degree search out of PH would require 36 to 40 AC.
I don't understand your statement that the mission of the CVL is to scout for the cruisers. A CVL was a light aircraft carrier usually built on the hull of a cruiser. (USS Independence) It had the speed to keep up with the fast carrier force and they were fast to build.
If you are talking about the float planes carried by BBs, CAs and CLs those originally were intended as scouts but evolved into spotters for gunfire and eventually were left off. My reference for Firefly gives the range of around 1000 miles.
The Corsair's first combat was on Valentine's day, 1943 but it did not see extensive carrier duty until 1944. Another reason a Firefly would not be looked on fondly by the USN was that it had a liquid cooled engine which the USN had pretty much banned in the !930s. By late 1944 the USN had moved more and more to the fighter bomber with the dive bomber and torpedo plane having smaller contingents on carriers. The reason for this was they needed more fighters to counter the kamikaze and the Hellcats and Corsairs could drop bombs and kill bombers, torpedo planes and kamikazes all in one package.
Wait, when you mean similar do you mean bomb load, and such or like airframe if that's similar?
.
Maybe a Ki-46. That has 2 crew looks somewhat similar.
Twin engine Douglas T2D's convertible wheel/float torpedo bombers conducted landing trials aboard USS Langley in 1927.
There is no record of No.811 Squadrons Sea Mosquitos ever going to sea".[/I]
Not a lot of reasons are given, but as you say, it was considered a very large aircraft and required RATO if it was to take off at maximum weight. Speed was limited to 300kts with a full bomb load and external stores. There was a tendency to 'swing' on take off, but this was later cured with a lockable tail wheel. The end of the Pacific War is also given as another reason, as this also ended it's intended requirement.
Do heavier planes usually require a higher take off speed, or does it depend on wing-loading? Do twins require a higher take-off speed? I was wondering because the Germans Japanese had lighter twin-engine A/C, like the Me 110 or Ki-45. Much lighter in fact than a Hellcat or Avenger.
Graeme said:Have you considered the Nakajima Saiun? Multi-place, very fast (378mph), nearly 2,000mile range, carrier capable and one version was armed with cannon. Who knows, a little tweaking here and there and you'd have the 'perfect' fighter reconnaissance carrier aircraft! (Just a thought)
The F4U1 had internal fuel capacity of 361 gallons which gave it a "yardstick" range of 1500-1600 miles. With one external tank that range was substantially increased. The mission you are envisioning for CVLs is much like the mission of the hunter-killer groups of U-boats except those were CVEs. By the time CVLs became available, the threat from German surface raiders was greatly diminished. In the 1939-41 time frame the British did have some groups hunting German raiders that contained CVs.