buffnut453
Captain
Only if they were equipped with lasers. Sharks with lasers? Bad. Catsharks with lasers? Very bad. Alas, all we get are disgruntled haddock...and no lasers!
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Gato is a catshark?
What in all of hells bells is a catshark?
Some Frankenstein freak of hellishness.
Such a creature would be the worst monster that ever lived.
In angling mythology the catshark was the sworn enemy of the dogfish.
Dream on, friend! Given the political climate in Japan at the time that would have been a non-starter. Any person or group making such a suggestion would have collected assassins like a fresh cowflap collects flies, despite its obvious (to us today) advantages.Japan should have done a switcheroo and joined the allies in 1940.
They then would have been able to keep Korea and Manchukuo until the end of time. The British and Dutch would have happily supplied all thier petroleum needs. Maybe even radar or raw materials.
You don't win any prizes backing the wrong horse.
Japan should have done a switcheroo and joined the allies in 1940.
They then would have been able to keep Korea and Manchukuo until the end of time. The British and Dutch would have happily supplied all thier petroleum needs. Maybe even radar or raw materials.
You don't win any prizes backing the wrong horse.
One P-51 ace. Hmmm.Nice and interesting thread. I had a couple of points to add.
Regarding American racist attitudes
These were very real of course but it's a bit more complex than the modern narrative tends to have us believe. A lot of it, as has been touched upon in the thread, overlaps with basic nationalist propaganda. All nations in WW2 did this - belittled and assigned negative racial stereotypes to their enemies. The British (and the Americans) called the Germans 'Huns', and depicted them like this:
View attachment 633677 View attachment 633678
Both in WWI and WW2. This was part of the nature of 'total war' thinking in those days, by pretty much everyone. And while the Americans treated Japanese immigrants especially badly, they did also intern some Germans and even some Italians.
Regarding the US and Asia specifically, I once read an article about how the US shifted between periods of being hostile toward China and friendly toward Japan, and the reverse. When they were hostile toward one country we tended to treat immigrants extremely badly, passing draconian laws against them, banning immigration and so on. When they were on friendlier terms, they began to import more and adapt aspects of each culture in turn. I actually think this still goes on, having lived through these kinds of phases in my own lifetime.
Regarding Japans technology
Hindsight is always 20-20. We have to keep in mind how far and how fast Japan had come. It's really staggering. Prior to the Boshin war, and the end of the Tokugawa Shogunate circa 1870, Japan was like one of those Kurosawa movies - people were settling scores with samurai swords. As far as Americans and most Europeans were concerned, they were these exotic people who were still living in the middle ages. Then all the sudden they had a modern (albeit, partly borrowed from the British) fleet and were beating the crap out of the Russians circa 1905. By the 1930s they were alarming everyone by their military successes in Manchuria etc., and it was dawning on the world that Japan wasn't just another remote backwater, but for them to come up to parity with the most advanced military's in the world, and beyond, by 1941 - was difficult to comprehend. Dan Carrlin's Supernova in the East helps put it in perspective pretty well I think.
To me, it's a bit like the rise of China today.
Regarding the NA-73
I don't think building more NA-73 / P-51A / A-36s would have improved the fighter situation in the Far East. It was faster than all our other pursuit planes but it did quite poorly as a fighter. There was only ever 1 Allison P-51 Ace. The problem was apparently due to ailerons, and was fixed with the P-51B as part of the general upgrade to the new engine. This, in my opinion, would have prevented the early Mustangs from making a Strategic difference in the Pacific.
However, I do think the NA 73 could have been helpful if they had some at say, Midway or the Philippines, as a recon plane and as a dive bomber. I don't think it is so unlikely they could have gotten some there as they had B-17s.. In the recon role, it had good range, I think better than all other US single engined aircraft, and a much faster cruise speed, and was quite hard to shoot down due to that speed. Fast recon might mean earlier detection of enemy ships. As a dive bomber, I think again it had better range than an SBD, and would probably be harder to shoot down. Whether or not they could hit ships with them I don't know, that would have a lot to do with training that wasn't as advanced in the USAAF as it was in the Navy, but I think it would have still been handier to have at Midway than those Vought Vindicators etc. An A-36 could run away from a Zero.
The Philippines
The big thing there was early warning and preparation. Most of the US planes, especially the fighters, were destroyed on the ground. It was bad luck for the Americans that they had just got some (painfully) brand new P-40E's the same week as the attack. We know from other battles, if they had an early warning in place (something they could have picked up from Chennault) and managed to have these fighters in the air, it could have helped enormously. Slowed the battle down, slowed Japan's momentum down. We know from places like Milne Bay etc. they could make a difference.
A better engine
I'm not even sure Japan was the biggest thing to worry about, as US fighters were particularly vulnerable to the German aircraft too. American war-planners and ranking officers knew about the Battle of France and the Battle of Britain and the lessons had been learned there - such as the need to fight at the highest altitude bombers could fly. As was pointed out a few times upthread, the Jimmy Thach thing was good preparation, probably just enough. The one other thing they might have done differently in my opinion, is to have developed a high altitude engine they could use effectively on a land based fighter in 1942. Two speed or two stage in-line engine, either an Allison or US made Merlin, would probably be the way to go. Not that they didn't make Packard Merlins obviously but maybe if they had been more cogniscent of the dangers they might have done more faster. Either that or fit one of those two-stage R-1830s on a P-36 or just rushed the P-47 or P-38 into development a bit faster.
I got it.One Allison-engined P-51 Ace.
Yes, one.One P-51 ace. Hmmm
One P-51 ace. Hmmm.
This is a good detailed history of a Japanese coup that did not take place. History would have been far different if it had.An excellent read on the issues under discussion here:
The Fate of Emperor Hirohito | The National WWII Museum | New Orleans
Would Japanese Emperor Hirohito remain in power after his nation’s surrender? His fate rested in part on the attitude of General Douglas MacArthur.www.nationalww2museum.org
This is a good detailed history of a Japanese coup that did not take place. History would have been far different if it had.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k74y7B0sEFo