Which side would you fly for?.......

Which side would you fly for?


  • Total voters
    122

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

WElcome to this little world of ours TimT1 :)
As a word to you we all have at least one aircraft that we are very passionate for, infact you left mine off you little short list, B-24! 8)

But that is fine, most people do, but the B-17 was off as well so that is just great! So you are a fighter lover, and a Pacific Theature at that? :lol: I hope so maybe we can talk some. :shock:
 
Politics aside, I'd choose to fly allied aircraft. I'll admit to wanting to fly different planes in different times and or theaters of the war. Not to mention different missions.

I'd love to fly a Hurricane or Spitfire durring the Battle of Britan. I can think of no finer point defense fighter than a SpitfireXII. For long range fighter escort , in europe, I'd take the P-47D or P-51D, in the pacific I' choose the P-38J or the P-47D. For operating off a carrier I'll go with the F6F-2 Hellcat, or maybe the F8F-1 Bearcat. Althought the Bearcat really never saw any combat in WWII.

There is ofcourse the Mosquito. In my oppinion the finest multi-role twin-engined aircraft of the war. The only thing to come close to the Mossie would be the Douglas A-26 Invader but again the A-26 barely saw service in the war.

Bomber wise I'll go for the ultimate. The B-29. But for europe I'll take the B-26 for a medium bomber and the B-24 for the heavy. Of the British offerings I've always liked the Shorts Stirling and the Halifax.

Of the palnes that the Soviet Union had to offer I'd go with IL-2 Stormovik for first choice with either the the Lagg-3 or the Pe-2 coming in as next choices.
 
A good choice a planes there, with the Soviets, Pe-2, Li-2 (Gunship), Il-2, Pe-8 and Yak-9U for me.
 
GLS, great pic for the bombers well the B-24 and Halifax!! I have never been able to warm up to the Short Stirling. But I am a fan of the B-24 and that is a small list. What makes you like it? The range, bombload, or the flexible airfram! It is sort of like the Halifax but longer range, payload and better guns!! 8)
 
For the A-26 fans, I do not think they came into the war that late. Introduced in the ETO in November of 1944, they would have been able to help in the end game. Yes that was not a great operational life like say the B-24 of the Spit. But the A-26 had a great and proud history and the airframe stayed in use until the 1960s and after. :p

Lanc, I might have to a gree that i am not shure how the Stirling was better then the Lanc, but the post was as C.C said "he liked it". That said the Stirling had a good payload, but poor range as I can find out. :(
 
it had a good payload but 'cos of the design of the bomb bay, it couldn't carry differing loads..................
 
I might be wrong thanks all, I should be reading more. But there is somthing that just rubs me the wrong way about the Stirling. The wings angle was very high and landing that must of been hard. Any info on that? :?:
 
Yes, the Brits had the Spitfire, Gladiator and all the others, but the Germans were the first to develope a Jet propelled Interceptor fighter... This would be the main reason I would say Axis. The Me262 and the Komet Me163 are the only reasons I would have chosen the Axis. This was a very diffucult decision, but the jetplanes just did it for me... Preferences, I guess
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back