Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
What about Ike?
Ike did not become president until 1952. He was the Commander in Chief of SHAEF during WW2. I would not class him with Churchill.
I believe that Ike was a good politician as a general having to deal with all the personalities in the Allied high command including Churchill, Monty, Patton, Alexander, DeGaulle, etc. I don't believe he was much of a strategist, for instance, compared to McArthur. He was the Commander in Chief of SHAEF during WW2. I would not class him with Churchill.
Of course I would have to go with Churchill. Truly a great motivator. The courage he helped instill in the British people, in the face of the greatest adversity of their day, was remarkable.
I believe that Ike was a good politician as a general having to deal with all the personalities in the Allied high command including Churchill, Monty, Patton, Alexander, DeGaulle, etc. I don't believe he was much of a strategist, for instance, compared to McArthur
I dont know about that Richard. Eisenhower had an extraordinarily difficult job. With capable, but self opinionated subordinates like Patton, Monty, De Gaulle and even Mallory to contend with, he had a pretty tough assigment.
I am a great fan of Eisenhower, Him and marshall are consistently underrated in my opinion
Yep, Stalin was a great leader. He killed all of his closest competitors and terrorised the rest and if you were one of his generals and did not suit him you were eliminated. I still go with Churchill.
Mackenzie King for me
Can any of the Canucks who voted for Mackenzie-King explain why they think he was a good leader?
Stalin was not a great leader, as such, but i am of the opinion that he was at least better than Hitler. He at least had the good sense not to interfere in operational matters as much as Hitler, and after the absolute act of paranoia he displayed by killing most of his officers, he did settle down enough to allow his army to recover, and produce some of the finest officers of the war,
I also think he was more realistic about the outcome of the postwar makeup of Europe, although to be fair, so was Churchill. The Americans were naive enough to trust Stalin at the end of the war. And didnt realize what his intentions were viz Eastern Europe
Jug makes a good point, one I never thought of . When Russia invaded Poland on 17 Sept 1939, why didn't Britain and France declare war on Stalin?
The US wasn't involved then Jug so when we did enter it was well beyond Barbarossa and Stalin was an "Ally".