schwarzpanzer
Senior Airman
- 662
- Aug 8, 2005
It's easy; ease of use.
Simply; simplicity!
The Spitfire vs the Me109 FW 190's vicious traits.
All were roughly equal performance pilot wise.
A German pilot test flying a Spit said how he felt at ease in it.
The German planes were waiting to bite the pilot.
Think if you were tired, which you'd rather fly?
The Mosin-Nagant, Lee-Enfield and M1 Garand were also easier to use than the K98k.
The Panzers needed to be used with extreme skill to be maintained and handled, the Allied/Soviet tanks were steady away.
IMHO by making equipment foolproof, you make it superior.
Of course give your Elites complicated/prototype stuff, but not your entire Armed Forces - as they just can't make good use of it.
Simply; simplicity!
The Spitfire vs the Me109 FW 190's vicious traits.
All were roughly equal performance pilot wise.
A German pilot test flying a Spit said how he felt at ease in it.
The German planes were waiting to bite the pilot.
Think if you were tired, which you'd rather fly?
The Mosin-Nagant, Lee-Enfield and M1 Garand were also easier to use than the K98k.
The Panzers needed to be used with extreme skill to be maintained and handled, the Allied/Soviet tanks were steady away.
IMHO by making equipment foolproof, you make it superior.
Of course give your Elites complicated/prototype stuff, but not your entire Armed Forces - as they just can't make good use of it.