- Thread starter
-
- #401
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Thanks for the lovely and thorough response! The turrets were manned by 88 sailors. The was one officer-level person in the gun house and one communications ofc of lower rank. When Ryan Syzmanski examined the roller bearings they were still perfect after 80 years. To his knowledge they were never replaced. I too am in awe of the 1930s/40s tech on display. Just the special lathes that were developed in the late 1800s to cut the step-thread Weilan breaches are amazing. To do so on a model is almost inconceivable.Absolutely amazing project, I'm in awe at the dedication, commitment and skill involved in seeing it through. Equally impressive is just the level of complexity and amount of equipment in each of those turrets. I had a chance to crawl into a small part of a turret on the USS Alabama in Mobile. For such a large assembly the interior space for the sailors is tiny and incredibly cramped! What further impresses me is all of the original design, fabrication and machining was done with 1930s-40s technology. No CAD design, all on the drafting board. No finite element analysis, all slide rules. No CNC machining or computer-drive burn tables. Would love to see how all those components were fabricated back in the day, particularly the massive roller bearings and ring gears of the turret ring. IIRC somewhere around 150 sailors were required to man each turret and magazine. Perhaps equally impressive-the sailors were (by my boomer standard) kids, all with limited enlistments for the most part, and all trained and capable of operating such a complex piece of equipment. Had to be a real performance when putting steel on target at a high rate of fire. Also would really like to understand more about just how the mechanical fire control computers actually worked.
I has to look up the Weilan breach. I'd seen pictures, but never realized that the threads were stepped, rather than being a simple 1/3 segment interrupted thread. Amazing design, and after seeing it, I can't envision how the heck it was machined, especially at that time frame. Now I have something else to spend time researching.Thanks for the lovely and thorough response! The turrets were manned by 88 sailors. The was one officer-level person in the gun house and one communications ofc of lower rank. When Ryan Syzmanski examined the roller bearings they were still perfect after 80 years. To his knowledge they were never replaced. I too am in awe of the 1930s/40s tech on display. Just the special lathes that were developed in the late 1800s to cut the step-thread Weilan breaches are amazing. To do so on a model is almost inconceivable.
An update:The Weilen lathes had a cam arrangement that kicked the cross slide back out of the cut as it reached the end of the segment. I'm sure a CNC could do it today without too much trouble. They were ingenious!
Regarding doing the drawings and calculations by hand… there is no doubt that computer drawing and design has reduced the drudgery and time, but not the mental effort. It just lets you make mistakes faster.
That said, I have a gear drawing extension on SketchUp that draws involute gears by just inputting pitch circle diameter and number of teeth. To draw the large internal ring gear, I first drew it as an external pinion and then used that planar profile as a "cutter" to inscribe the gear's shape in reverse inside the ring. I used PUSH-PULL to extrude the gear's 3D shape. The extension can not draw ring gears so you have to finesse them. Forget about drawing one by hand. It's a non-starter.
All kinds of very sophisticated high tech had to be available to a "normal" hobbyist like me in order to pull off a model like this. I've made a list and it's long. "Normal" is in quotes since my wife may disagree with that description. The word "obsessed" is often thrown about.