Aircraft Identification Thread I (2 Viewers)

[GermansRGeniuses]

Fw-189?


That's called a twin-boom...

 

[GermansRGeniuses]

Or is it Fw-191?

 

[JCS]

Gotha Go244?

 

[GermansRGeniuses]

This format sucks...


We need to bring back the photos for guesses!

 

[plan_D]

P-38.

The Spiteful didn't see service in World War 2.

 

[Yeomanz]

- you lot are forgetting those friendly chaps from the pacific , you know the J..................................................

 

[plan_D]

Is there something wrong up there that prevents you from saying Japanese?

 

[Yeomanz]

yes im allergic

 

[cheddar cheese]

Mitsubishi G3M?

 

[cheddar cheese]

GrG is right this format does suck, post a picture of it...

 

[the lancaster kicks ass]

oohhh and i was so close to having a good idea

 

[cheddar cheese]

So near yet so far away...

 

[Yeomanz]

you jusy cant get it thats why yhour being mardy

, why dont you look through your archive CC , it has two engines and a twin boom , but did i say these two engines were on the wing ....

 

[cheddar cheese]

I am looking through my archive!

 

[the lancaster kicks ass]

well there else could they really be?? the only other thing i can think of is the Do-335 but that doesn't have a twin boom...........

 

[cheddar cheese]

And it isnt Japanese....

I think I know what hes on about, I recall looking at a Jap twin boom a couple of weeks back but I cant remember now...

 

[JCS]

Well, I give up on this one...I cant think of anything else to search for....

 

[cheddar cheese]

Put us out of our misery Yeo...

 

[Yeomanz]

Ki-94 I , twin boom with a engine in the front and back

CC you can go next

 

[R Pope]

Shame, shame, Yeomanz, for making the denizens of this thread rack their little brains pointlessly searching for an aircraft that never existed! The Ki-94 was built as a conventional single-engine machine, your twin-boom push-pull jobbie was only built in mock-up and rejected.