B-17, B-24, or Lancaster

Dont take me wrong, the people who have flown it are obviously the utmost athority on the subject and should be believed, I just hate it when people come in here and say things like that to people especially when they dont know anything about the person.
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet said:
Dont take me wrong, the people who have flown it are obviously the utmost athority on the subject and should be believed, I just hate it when people come in here and say things like that to people especially when they dont know anything about the person.

Especially that guy who got insulted becuase I said the Mig-25 was a pig and then he told me I had a dismal aviation career!
 
syscom3 said:
Whats wrong with flight sims?

Theyre can be as accurate as the designer wants it to be and for any budget!

The defence rests its case, some people do believe.
 
And those people have never felt the vibrations, heard the noise, felt the turbulence, and heard the rounds pinging into the skin of there aircraft or they would realize that it is not as accurate as they think.
 
DerAdlerIstGelandet said:
And those people have never felt the vibrations, heard the noise, felt the turbulence, and heard the rounds pinging into the skin of there aircraft or they would realize that it is not as accurate as they think.

OK, the simulator will be sitting on one of those 'shaker" tables to simulate turbulence, kids will be employed to throw things at the mock cockpit to simulate "pings" and a nice speaker setup will be used to give you 3D sound effects
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back