May 22, 2011 #1 syscom3 Pacific Historian 15,698 15,189 Joined Jun 4, 2005 Location Orange County, CA Interesting video. Boeing 747-8 performs ultimate rejected takeoff (Video)
May 22, 2011 #2 Airframes Benevolens Magister 64,231 15,147 Joined Aug 24, 2008 Location Cheshire, UK Interesting stuff indeed. Thanks for posting.
May 22, 2011 #3 T tyrodtom Senior Master Sergeant 3,647 1,351 Joined Sep 6, 2010 Location pound va I wonder how much total runway that test used ?
May 22, 2011 #4 razor1uk Staff Sergeant 1,437 55 Joined Dec 12, 2008 Location Tamago no Chie, (B'ham, UK) proberly within the average 'heavy' runway length or whatever it is?
May 22, 2011 #5 Gnomey Globetrotting Surgeon General Staff Mod 75,875 11,598 Joined Nov 28, 2004 Location Bristol / Southsea / Royal Deeside, UK Website www.flickr.com Interesting find, thanks for sharing!
May 22, 2011 #6 pbfoot 1st Lieutenant 6,970 35 Joined Apr 14, 2005 Location niagara falls tyrodtom said: I wonder how much total runway that test used ? Click to expand... you can see the length markers as he goes , looks to 12000ft rwy
tyrodtom said: I wonder how much total runway that test used ? Click to expand... you can see the length markers as he goes , looks to 12000ft rwy
May 22, 2011 #7 T tyrodtom Senior Master Sergeant 3,647 1,351 Joined Sep 6, 2010 Location pound va It's not quite the ultimate rejected takeoff test. What about with a wet runway ?
May 22, 2011 Thread starter #8 syscom3 Pacific Historian 15,698 15,189 Joined Jun 4, 2005 Location Orange County, CA Maybe Flyboy can answer that one. Last edited: May 22, 2011
May 22, 2011 #9 T tyrodtom Senior Master Sergeant 3,647 1,351 Joined Sep 6, 2010 Location pound va I guess a wet runway wouldn't be harder on the brakes, since the antiskid would probably have the brakes cycling on and off. But it would use more runway, and it would be harder on the sphincter muscle in a real incident, instead of a test.
I guess a wet runway wouldn't be harder on the brakes, since the antiskid would probably have the brakes cycling on and off. But it would use more runway, and it would be harder on the sphincter muscle in a real incident, instead of a test.
May 22, 2011 #10 vikingBerserker Lieutenant General 28,790 4,633 Joined Apr 10, 2009 Location South Carolina I have to admit, that's still pretty dam impressive. Cool post syscom!
May 23, 2011 #11 Torch Senior Master Sergeant 3,179 1,064 Joined Feb 9, 2006 Location Florida Nice, always liked the 747, glad it continues to fly on.....