Carriers!!

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Did the U.S ever have a name for the P-51 or did they just accept the British name straight away? I know the A-36 was Apache but that's not the P-51. Apache is a great name.
 
As far as capital vessels go I think many more USN higher ups where aware that the day of the big gun ship was drawing to a close and the carrier was now the master of the sea, where as the RN clung on to the power of the Grand Fleet for some time longer
The last ever action between these type of vessels was The Battle of Surigao Strait 24th - 25th October 1944, but it had been recognised even by the British that the Battleship era had passed into history some years earlier than this final battle.
 
It's like saying that Apache isn't a good name because, to me, it's the AH-64.

Native American tribe first, plane second, helicopter third.
 
Yes, trackend, that was one of the battles in the Battle of the Leyte Gulf as it has become to be known. The last of the great sea battles. I really enjoyed presenting about that battle. Plus I got to speak with a vet of that battle that put a torpedo into the Zuikaku!
 
I wish this pond was'nt so big Evan I would be down your museum having my ear bent all the time. Oh by the way you do realise you said boat. ol Skim will be jumping up and down at that remark :)
 
Rich, just a small mistyping:

Quote:
The easiest illustration of this is Enterprise and Saratoga going out in November 1941 to ferry aircraft to Wake and Midway.


They were Enterprise (F4F to Wake) and Lexington (SB2U to Midway).

Jeez Louise, how the heck did I get Saratoga??? I really do know better.

On the subject of Saratoga, though, let me look around for joint operations with Victorious information and get back. I think I've gone down that road before and there's scant available, but it won't hurt to look again.

Rich
 
Ok all , Flyboy the two flat tops at Pearl were great, it also lets you know how deep that water at the dock is and the size f the space, to hod them side by side. :)

Question: is one backed in, because the two islands are side bye side?

Here is a thought the RN contracts British firms for the ships and US bassed fo the planes. I read over the planned carriers they look interesting, two islands, and still the sky jump deck. But why are they not nukular powered, or did I miss that? The site listed sounded like the ships were only able to hold fuel, food, and the like for a week or so? I will be surprised if both make it to commission. But for the USN USS Ronald Regan, (great name for a Capital Ship), is almost ready for full service.
 
MP-Willow said:
Ok all , Flyboy the two flat tops at Pearl were great, it also lets you know how deep that water at the dock is and the size f the space, to hod them side by side. :)

Question: is one backed in, because the two islands are side bye side?

Yep - one is backed in so they were able to fit in the docking area. I guess when they were being docked the whole process really perplexed those doing it!
 
Just a thought but is there any point in having nuclear carrier, if the escort isn't. After all the supply ships will still need to go with the fleet.
 
I think the idea Glider is that the carrier can be kept in the theater for extended periods as even the USN as not got a large number of super carriers so rotating them is a big problem where as changing the escorts
can be done relatively easily
 
Trackend, Could be certainly, but there is more to keeping a ship on station than just having fuel. Either way I don't think we have had any major problems using conventional power. It was just a thought that I had.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back