buffnut453
Captain
They aren't. See post #1627 if you need proof.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I hope the general public is smarter than that.
Saw that on the news.Good to see that crass stupidity still hasn't been eradicated:
Michigan protesters honk against coronavirus order
While I appreciate the desire to get back to work, I'm just shaking my head at the woman who wants things to reopen so she can "buy things we need" (ignoring, for a moment, the fact that people can get what we need (food, medication etc) in pretty much all countries...they just can't get everything they want).
The next comment takes the biscuit, though. She wants shops to open so she can get her hair dyed to hide her grey roots. That is SUCH a First World problem!
I'm not normally a vengeful person but I find a small part of me hoping some of these idiots contract the virus because they didn't maintain social distancing during this protest.
ours was "can you give a time limit on the lockdown ?" From the BBC's chief political correspondent.Latest brain-dead reporter question to our PM minutes ago....."Why didn't this weeks deaths match your prediction model last week?"
Yesterday the B.C. lockdown was extended to the end of Aprilours was "can you give a time limit on the lockdown ?" From the BBC's chief political correspondent.
30 seconds after the Home Secretary went into detail explaining the criteria for easing restrictions and how it would be irresponsible to pre guess any outcome without looking at the data first !
It is now clear that our journalists study "how to be stupid" to a very high level, all questions today showed the journalist hadn't listened, hadn't a clue what is happening or both. There is more talk of "modelling" in the briefing than there is on this forum, I hope they never move onto air brush techniques.ours was "can you give a time limit on the lockdown ?" From the BBC's chief political correspondent.
30 seconds after the Home Secretary went into detail explaining the criteria for easing restrictions and how it would be irresponsible to pre guess any outcome without looking at the data first !
We have three more weeks !Yesterday the B.C. lockdown was extended to the end of April
Oh, we have lots of questions like that, that is the base level of stupidity (based on present modelling). Today we had "What do you think will be learned from this when the pandemic is over" the ministers answer was followed by "Do you think you will impose sanctions on China then"?Latest brain-dead reporter question to our PM minutes ago....."Why didn't this weeks deaths match your prediction model last week?"
You can't both walk a half klick and meet in the middle? Sneak somebody over in the night and stay a few days? Meet at WalMart or PigglyWiggly or whatever you have there?The missus is going bat-sh!t crazy because she can't see/hug the grandkid who lives a kilometer away
In better news, 99 year-old WW2 veteran completes 100 laps of his garden as a fundraiser....and raises GBP 12 million for the UK's National Health Service:
STILL THE GREATEST GENERATION!!!!
Yesterday, another Grade-A idiot...https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/brit...ry-clerk-over-limit-on-toilet-paper-1.5533624Good to see that crass stupidity still hasn't been eradicated:
Michigan protesters honk against coronavirus order
While I appreciate the desire to get back to work, I'm just shaking my head at the woman who wants things to reopen so she can "buy things we need" (ignoring, for a moment, the fact that people can get what we need (food, medication etc) in pretty much all countries...they just can't get everything they want).
The next comment takes the biscuit, though. She wants shops to open so she can get her hair dyed to hide her grey roots. That is SUCH a First World problem!
I'm not normally a vengeful person but I find a small part of me hoping some of these idiots contract the virus because they didn't maintain social distancing during this protest.
I'm sorry for my reply to buffnut453, sometime i don't remember the political ban
and then it took a turn for the south.
ours was "can you give a time limit on the lockdown ?" From the BBC's chief political correspondent.
30 seconds after the Home Secretary went into detail explaining the criteria for easing restrictions and how it would be irresponsible to pre guess any outcome without looking at the data first !
No one knows the origin, there are many theories, but it means taking a turn for the worse.I think this means something which has nothing to do with the cardinal points