Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Its a poor comparison to compare chemo to taking malaria drugs for CV19. Chemo is at least approved, and has shown to be effective. Doctors from the beginning were saying that so far tests for the drug have had very limited results in fighting CV19, and that there needed to be more testing before it is approved.
Except its not the doctors who are recommending it.I was not comparing the two. The point I was making was that everyday people take medicines that do damage to their bodies for the purpose of fighting a disease. Also, I don't quite understand the hang-up about the drug not being approved for use against COVid-19. There are dozens of drugs that are prescribed for off-label uses and HC was approved for use in 1955. There are millions prescribed the drug every year just in the US. The dangers and side effects are well-known. Now, yes it needs more study, and I believe that is what most studies and criticisms conclude, but in the meantime I'm on the side of letting doctors decide how to best treat their patients because they are the one's that will find what really works through trial and error. There are also other drugs that are being used as a treatment, but there does not seem to be such a backlash against them., nor were they approved to fight the disease either. Studies are nice when we have the time to go through all the protocols, labs tests, animal and human subject tests, etc, but treatments need to be devised because the economic devastation caused by the societal shutdown is only getting worse. The cost of a barrel of oil was fell below zero today. Now I am not a fan of big oil corporations, Saudi sheiks, or Russian oligarchs, but that is not good.
Except its not the doctors who are recommending it.
Patient turns up, demands the treatment they've seen advertised (or endorsed by a President), so the doctor gives in and prescribes it. After all, the customer is always right, huh?
The testing is also to find out if it can make it worse for patients. Would you still be so keen to take the drug if you were told "here, take this pill, it may make you better... or it may make you worse"
I was not comparing the two. The point I was making was that everyday people take medicines that do damage to their bodies for the purpose of fighting a disease. Also, I don't quite understand the hang-up about the drug not being approved for use against COVid-19. There are dozens of drugs that are prescribed for off-label uses and HC was approved for use in 1955. There are millions prescribed the drug every year just in the US. The dangers and side effects are well-known. Now, yes it needs more study, and I believe that is what most studies and criticisms conclude, but in the meantime I'm on the side of letting doctors decide how to best treat their patients because they are the one's that will find what really works through trial and error. There are also other drugs that are being used as a treatment, but there does not seem to be such a backlash against them., nor were they approved to fight the disease either. Studies are nice when we have the time to go through all the protocols, labs tests, animal and human subject tests, etc, but treatments need to be devised because the economic devastation caused by the societal shutdown is only getting worse. The cost of a barrel of oil was fell below zero today. Now I am not a fan of big oil corporations, Saudi sheiks, or Russian oligarchs, but that is not good.
Except its not the doctors who are recommending it.
Patient turns up, demands the treatment they've seen advertised (or endorsed by a President), so the doctor gives in and prescribes it. After all, the customer is always right, huh?
I don't quite understand the hang-up about the drug not being approved for use against COVid-19.
in the meantime I'm on the side of letting doctors decide how to best treat their patients because they are the one's that will find what really works through trial and error.
Is the alternative death? Not trying to be an ass here. but if its a choice between experimental treatment or dying. I'll choose the former and live with the consequences.
but if its a choice between experimental treatment or dying.
I read that improved sanitation actually led to the polio epidemics of last century. this virus malarkey is more complicated than I thought possible.Except we practice fairly good hygiene where faeces is involved. I know I try to keep it as far away from my face as possible...
Oh, and is the virus viable?
When you read the details of that scheme it was dreamed up by a schemer. Basically the EU takes money from states and places bulk orders around the world, then distributes it as the EU sees fit. This doesn't produce any more PPE, it drives up the price then gives it to people the EU wants to bribe or curry favour with. If they were setting up a factory or factories to mass produce the basic plastics and other materials then make the basics by the million to help all in Europe and the world I would have been impressed. Of course that is the last thing on their minds. They have spent six months ruminating on a process to make things worse but as usual they are so late to the game it will be finished with by the time they are ready, for the next time.News channels in a feeding frenzy about the UK government's failure to join the EU's ppe procurement plan last month !
Trouble is said plan has yet to deliver a single item of ppe to anybody so it didnt make a single bit of difference !
Exactly, but its not going to stop whichever BBC correspondent asking why we delayed joinng this holy grail of ppe procurement schemes that would've saved thousands of lives during this crisis !When you read the details of that scheme it was dreamed up by a schemer. Basically the EU takes money from states and places bulk orders around the world, then distributes it as the EU sees fit. This doesn't produce any more PPE, it drives up the price then gives it to people the EU wants to bribe or curry favour with. If they were setting up a factory or factories to mass produce the basic plastics and other materials then make the basics by the million to help all in Europe and the world I would have been impressed. Of course that is the last thing on their minds. They have spent six months ruminating on a process to make things worse but as usual they are so late to the game it will be finished with by the time they are ready, for the next time.
Italy report, 5 pm (CEST) 22th April
cases 187,327, +3,370, deaths 25,085, +437, recovered 54,543, + 2,943, active cases 107,699, -10, tests 1,513,251, +63,101
fatality rate 13.4%
mortality rate 416 per million
test rate 25.1 per thousand
positive rate 12.4%
test rate today 1,046 per million
positive rate today 5.3%