Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
As has been my bain lately, the kit does not address the interior, etc. colors? Apply common RAF cockpit colors of the period?nice.
had no real problems when i built mine
My incorrect assumption that the under wing numbers WRI 28 were all out of whack. If one reads the directionsNifty looking aircraft Ralph. Other than not being in RCAF markings, what are the decal errors?
View attachment 636187
the pic source and more shots :
View attachment 636189
the pic source and more images:
1/32 DH-100 Vampirella Mk. 3 from Infinity models
A quick news from Mirekforum.largescalemodeller.com
As for RCAF markings. Did Canada have an FB.MK.9 (or older)?
RCAF had Mk.3 only + 1 Mk.I for testing. As per the above mentioned page by Harold Scarup:I did find a 3 and a 5. Seriously plain though....
cockpit was black.As has been my bain lately, the kit does not address the interior, etc. colors? Apply common RAF cockpit colors of the period?
Also, this kit eludes to a 'weight'. Did you have to use any to keep it from tail dragging? If so about how much? I have plenty of shot gun pellets left from a previous build needing them.
Catch - The CA discussion started with Fubar's lament that it would have been nicer if my selection were to have had RACF markings (post #4). Sorry I started this confusion, back to being pure RAF....RCAF had Mk.3 only + 1 Mk.I for testing. As per the above mentioned page by Harold Scarup:
....de Havilland DH.100 Vampire Mk. I (1), (Serial No. TG372), Mk. III (85), (Serial Nos. 17001-17042, 17044-17086), for a total of 86 aircraft.
Mk.5 (correct designation is FB.5) were loaned by RAF to the 421 (F) Squadron in England. They were never used in Canada.
AA-P on one of your photos is a Swiss Mk.6 and even in Canadian markings was never used by the RCAF.
The Vampire below was also never flown in Canada, but represents one of the most interesting Vampires in the RCAF - "bat face" from the 442 Squadron, City of Vancouver.
View attachment 636294
Profile of the real one:
View attachment 636295
And a restored Mk.3:
View attachment 636296
I might try the new Airfix-model if it comes out as promised.
I don't quite understand why was your Vampire FB.9 put in any connection with RCAF in the first place?AFAIK FB.9 was a tropicalized version of FB.5 and had clipped wings.
I have an old article how to make a F.3 from FB.9 - if you really want to do it, see attached.
Cheers!
O-o-o-ps! I didn't see his post - I started reading by post #7....Catch - The CA discussion started with Fubar's lament that it would have been nicer if my selection were to have had RACF markings (post #4). Sorry I started this confusion, back to being pure RAF....
looks great.
also i have lots of spare decals for that kit if you want any of them ?
only one i used was the second last one on second pic !
View attachment 637360View attachment 637361W