Girls and Aircraft - Volume II (1 Viewer)

DerAdlerIstGelandet · Oct 12, 2018

special ed said:
If it had been stronger we might have seen more. Methinks the dress was all she wore.

Me thinks you should read the forum rules.

Nudity of any kind is not allowed on this forum for various reasons. Even when it is as nice as the one you posted...

Don't get the thread closed.

GrauGeist · Oct 13, 2018

DerAdlerIstGelandet said:
Don't get the thread closed.

Yeah, seriously.
And how I miss the "Breaking News" thread...

Wayne Little · Oct 13, 2018

Great Pics.

Graeme · Oct 13, 2018

special ed said:
Methinks the dress was all she wore.

Actually, the young woman in that photo had a little more decorum - your image was adulterated.
This is the original...

special ed · Oct 13, 2018

Question= Should I censor my photos with nose art. The CAF nose art panels from their hangar are in or out? Restored acft have nose art equivalent to the objected post, some with frontal nudity. This wasn't exactly covered in rules but the message in signatures is a good guide. I need a little more info.

special ed · Oct 13, 2018

Also the WW2 B&W negatives I restored are a bit more than the offensive post. Should I be selective? I am not trying to argue, just get with the program.

DerAdlerIstGelandet · Oct 13, 2018

special ed said:
Question= Should I censor my photos with nose art. The CAF nose art panels from their hangar are in or out? Restored acft have nose art equivalent to the objected post, some with frontal nudity. This wasn't exactly covered in rules but the message in signatures is a good guide. I need a little more info.

If it is legit historical nose art, it is fine.

DerAdlerIstGelandet · Oct 13, 2018

special ed said:
Also the WW2 B&W negatives I restored are a bit more than the offensive post. Should I be selective? I am not trying to argue, just get with the program.

Again aircraft nose art is fine.

Pictures of living, breathing nude people are not.