Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
syscom3 said:Bekka Valley!!! At one point there were over 200 aircraft batteling in the air at the same time!!! That's about as high intensity as it gets!!!!!
Thats a single battle.
And the Bekka valley was nothing like flying over Hanoi/Haiphong or over the Suez/Golan heights in 1973.
The F4 performed well as a recon, fighter-bomber and a wild weasel. The F15 has only flown combat missions as a fighter (and yes I know about the F15E)
syscom3 said:Bekka Valley!!! At one point there were over 200 aircraft batteling in the air at the same time!!! That's about as high intensity as it gets!!!!!
Thats a single battle.
And the Bekka valley was nothing like flying over Hanoi/Haiphong or over the Suez/Golan heights in 1973.
The F4 performed well as a recon, fighter-bomber and a wild weasel. The F15 has only flown combat missions as a fighter (and yes I know about the F15E)
Yea - it's called mach lawndart!syscom3 said:What made the F15 superior was its engines. Put those F100 engines in an F4 and the Phantom has a whole different flight regime.
DerAdlerIstGelandet said:Point being?
Do you really think that a F-4 would beat a F-15 in a fight?
syscom3 said:As Ive said numerous times, we have to breakout the aircraft by "eras".
The F15 could beat an F4, which could beat an F100, which could beat an F86, which could beat an P80, which could beat an P47, which could beat ....blah blah blah blah.
From 1960 through the middle 70's, the F4 was the best fighter and it proved it in two major airwars.
If flown correctly - yes. F-8s and F-4s used to go at it all the time in early top gun classes.davparlr said:Yes, but could an F-4 beat a F-8, or even an F-5E?