Just saw this article over at FB (thanks for sharing the laugh, Joe!)
Apparently, the amateur pilot was not to blame, but his antique World War II plane was
So, according to this "professional" journalist; "Apparently,
the amateur pilot was not to blame, but his antique World War II plane was."
My observation here, is that Harrison has logged more hours (over 4,000) as a pilot than this journalist has logged writing articles.
Why didn't the amateur author simply state: "The pilot (or Mr. Ford) was not found to be at fault, instead, the aircraft suffered a malfunction"...or something along those lines.
It almost seems to me that the author was trying to create an air of uncertainty about the pilot or get in a little bit of subtle GA bashing...