Njaco
The Pop-Tart Whisperer
N worries!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
The Bills might surprise some they are better then last year and last years record was decievingHere we go!!
Some lucky breaks early for the Colts, Bills, and Ravens....
Must be exciting living at the centre of the universeeh...a team with a decent secondary should do the trick.....
Glad the Cowdummies lost so congrats to your J-E-T-S Jets Harrison. But to give the devil his due......Revis didn't wear down Dez. Dez was hurt on a punt return (thigh) and was ineffective the rest of the game. Don't get me wrong, I'm glad he didn't do anything else. Just saying....
My poor Steelers got their back side tanned. They better wake up.
In case you guys have not heard, ESPN has been championing their QBR rating as a better formula for a QBs performance than the typical nil QB rating, and looking at how they rated quarterbacks this week, it looks like complete nonsense, and some people at ESPN need to acquire some common sense in how they rate quarterback performances.
Case in point:
Donovan Mcnabb's stats were:
7/15 (46.7%) for 39 yards with 1 TD and 1 INT, this performance earned Mcnabb a QBR rating of 20.7
Now compare this to Sanchez who went 26/44 (59.1%) for 335 yards with 2 TD 1 INT (and a fumble) this earned Sanchez a QBR rating of 17.6
That's right 17.6, 3 points LOWER than McNabb's pathetic performance. Sanchez completed more passes, for a higher completion percentage with 300 more yards, and one more score and both McNabb and Sanchez's picks led to TDs, how the heck is this supposed to work out? Looks like ESPN needs to go back to the drawing board.