Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
The only place/s I have see that is on internet forums. Maybe I don't own the right books. It may be true. What is really strange is that of all the Wildcats the British received, both paid for and lend lease, something like 2/3 or better had four guns. Apparently the British didn't get the benefit of their own expertise in this case. There are also timing issues to work out. The P-40D with four wing mounted .50s was ordered during the early part of the battle of Britain, The first one wasn't delivered until late spring of 1941. Only about 30 or so built because the contract had been amended to 6 guns. When and Why? it could take months for such a change to go from paper order to actual production model rolling of the line.just to pick on one product....wasnt the f4f redesigned from a four gun broadside to a six gun broadside, on the basis of british advice and experience. There are a lot here that criticise this change, but given the relative advantages of the enemy pilots and equipment in 1939-42, giving the allied pilots the ability to unload a large amount of ordinance in a short space of time was probably the right thing to do at that stage......
The F4U was redesigned to accept more guns (4 -> 6), all now located in wings. That required deletion of wing tanks, necessitating installment of a large hull fuel tank to solve that. Therefore the hull too endured stretching. Quite a lot of redesign (coupled with peace time development) - no wonder it took time to execute properly.
Ren, do you have any info about how much fuel XF4U carried?
No production F4U was equipped with only four 50s. The F4U-1 and -1A had wing fuel tanks and six 50s. The wing fuel tanks were not removed until the -1D was delivered. I am not sure but I believe the wing tanks were removed on the -1D because by that time long range flight was not as important as earlier in the war. Renrich would probably know.
According to Lundstrom the six gun package in the F4F4 was solely at the behest of the British Purchasing group and was strongly resisted by the USN.
The six guns was obviously a mistake and my guess is that the British wanted it because they were accustomed to eight or even twelve guns and four just did not seem like enough. The USN, on the other hand, felt that pilots well trained in gunnery were better off in the carrier warfare environment with more ammo per gun and a longer firing time. Thach said, "If you can't hit with four you would miss with eight." (I think.)
Why the delay between prototype and production? Of course, the urgency was not there until December, 1941 which partially is an explanation. Another explanation obviously is that there is little use in producing airplanes if there are no engines for the aircraft.
However, there is another point which the report you posted does not address. We have all heard about the performance and reliability of the P&W R2800 engine but in 1940, 1941 and later, the R2800 was far from a finished and fine tuned product. In Guyton's book they continually had problems with the engine as well as the Hamilton Standard prop. In the production models of the F4U1, in 1942 and later there were a number of crashes caused by engine failures, one of which almost killed Guyton, putting him in the hospital for a number of months. Whether these were design flaws or production defects, letters between Vought and P&W (both owned by United Aircraft) were flying back and forth and redesigns and manufacturing process changes must have caused delays in R2800 production. Even when airplanes like the Corsair and Thunderbolt became operational, there were electrical problems with the engine which showed up during high altitude operation.