Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
I think these are the biggest points the anti-F-35 community either don't understand or choose to ignore.
Yep, and between using laymans terms and translation, what did the original Chinese info say?Several USN/USAF types have two-seats, but only one pilot.
So much for being a multirole aircraft. As a seaplane, it sucks!I have some information. British F-35s dont float.
I have only seen a short clip, if the pilot landed back on the deck that is a helluva stunt.Pretty good imitation of a submarine, though.
Imagine landing on top of another plane parked on the deck. That would have been epic!I have only seen a short clip, if the pilot landed back on the deck that is a helluva stunt.
It is funny because no one was hurt, normally I would say heads will roll after this but they wont, I saw a documentary on the Queen Elizabeth, it came over as an outward bound bonding experience for young people, like they have on sailing ships.Imagine landing on top of another plane parked on the deck. That would have been epic!
"Sorry sir, my aircraft experienced a little malfunction, I'll take this one instead!"
He was a very glorified bean counterIs it true that guy didn't actually design anything aviation?
Had he ever heard of the F4 which most people would agree was a very effective multi role aircraft, used with great success by the USAAF, USN, Marines and a good chunk of NATO.Yep - and now, 770 units (and counting) later all those dinosaurs who didn't understand the technology behind the aircraft can eat crow!