some F35 info (2 Viewers)

Noted and logged, this day. 😉
 
Had he ever heard of the F4 which most people would agree was a very effective multi role aircraft, used with great success by the USAAF, USN, Marines and a good chunk of NATO.
In a much simpler world, the F4 filled the "low" slot in a de facto F15/F16-style high/low mix where "high" was the F111, although the concept of "high/low mix" was not a thing yet. The battlespace was a much simpler place back then.
Interesting that in both cases it was the "low" aircraft that hit the sweet spot in all around effectiveness (sorry, Biff!). Do we have a trend here? Stay tuned, kids!
 
Last edited:
Dear God, here we go again with the old "F-16 defeats F-35" nugget...

Yes, an F-16 bested an F-35, but what they don't mention, is that it was an F-35 prototype without the pilot feedback warfare electronics installed.

There's a huge difference between a mock encounter with a test-bed and actual combat, FFS.
 
There's a huge difference between a mock encounter with a test-bed and actual combat, FFS.
AND a huge difference between an actual close-in knife fight setup and a real world engagement that begins BVR.
 
 
Alot of countries are buying into this platform, the next upgrade is substantial, engine, cooling and electronics and yet theres still nay sayers. All the buyers can't be that stupid.

It's almost like everything is all part of Lockheeds plan. Everything including the Ukraine War. All to increase sales…

:D
 
Last edited:
They are obnoxiously loud aren't they?

Every base I go to, people always curse them. 😂

Hear them every day in the circuit here at Hill AFB. Haven't cursed them yet. :)
 
Hear them every day in the circuit here at Hill AFB. Haven't cursed them yet. :)

You are the first then. When I am at the hangar there, the guts are always complaining. Same at Edwards.

The only place it did not bother me was at the Hill Golf Course having lunch.

Edit: and you are weird then. :D
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back