Ta152-H1 uber-fighter?

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Adler it is still a bit big in my estimation. thanks for the introduction into saving the fonts.... I'll try that and see what happens

Gruß
 

Type: Short-Range Air-to-Air missile.
Powerplant: one two-stage solid propellant rocket motor
Performance: cruising speed Mach 3 or 1,980 mph at 40,000 feet. Maximum range 7 miles.
Weight: 330 lb
Warhead: 68-lb HE
 
Source of this document?

My understanding was the first Red Top missiles used vacume tubes, later they were upgraded to use solid state technology (in the 70's).

=S=

Lunatic
 
Where is YOUR source for the vacuum tube story then? If you are going to ask for sources, you better be ready to cough up yours as well.

So what if they used vacuum tubes? Did you know that alot of early Russian jets used vacuum tubes, and not for the reason that most people think. Vacuum tubes are far less succeptable to the EMP from a nuclear explosion than solid state electronics.

Well built tubes would not affect the functioning of the missile.
 
Sorry, I forgot the source. "Encyclopedia of World Air Power" - Bill Gunston (1985)

Old but not too old to know about the Red Top.
 

I never said vacume tubes were all bad. But they did have problems with high G tolerance, and cooling issues for IR sensors.

My reason for asking was I suspect the Red Top had vacume tube tech at the start and then transitioned to solid state. But I could be wrong on this, its just that 1964 seems too early for solid state given my reading on the subject.

I've posted numerous sources already.

=S=

Lunatic
 
I did a search to see what I could find about the vacuum tubes and I could not find anything but this.
 
Gents

May you advise me on any pilots, who flew Ta-152, preferably against Soviets? Any aces among them?

Friend of mine makes a flying model of the plane and wants to paint it as specific as possible.

Thanks!
 
Umm lets see what I can find. It was not used as much as you think in combat because there were not very many built. From what I have found so far the aircraft saw most of its combat in the defense of Berlin against the Russians.

Okay here looks like a good one for you:

Walter Loos

 

Attachments

  • green_4_cs_small2_706.jpg
    20.7 KB · Views: 748
Loos victories during the summer/fall of 44 are suspect and Stab./JG 301 never defeneded ANY jet bases. Not sure where this myth has come from or evolved. Jupp Keil was an ace with the Tank and Will Reschke was close flying several different numbered Tanks
 
the best reading on the Ta 152H is in Willi Reschke's JG 301/302 book now translated to English by Schiffer pubs.

yes the Stab/JG 301 was in the defence of Berlin and there were actually more victories against Sopviet a/c that have been claimed.

JG 301 will be covered by Jerry Crandall with many profiles and a special tribute to the Ta 152H with several different above, below, side views, cockpit details, armament details. I will be supplying some material/pics when he gets to that point for the work
 

Users who are viewing this thread