The Camarillo 2006 album

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

evangilder

"Shooter"
19,049
208
Sep 17, 2004
Moorpark, CA
www.vg-photo.com
I thought I would start another thread for the Camarillo 2006 show. It was a nice show this year even though it was a bit smaller than previous years. My saturday photography was close to a disaster. I was experimenting and it went poorly. I was able to get some good shots on saturday but the good/bad ratio was terrible. Sunday went much better. Here are some shots in no particular order.
 

Attachments

  • DSC_8454.jpg
    DSC_8454.jpg
    37.2 KB · Views: 63
  • DSC_8500.jpg
    DSC_8500.jpg
    33.4 KB · Views: 79
  • DSC_8420.jpg
    DSC_8420.jpg
    39.5 KB · Views: 81
  • DSC_7910.jpg
    DSC_7910.jpg
    39.2 KB · Views: 75
  • DSC_7930.jpg
    DSC_7930.jpg
    35.4 KB · Views: 74
  • DSC_8302.jpg
    DSC_8302.jpg
    28.3 KB · Views: 73
  • DSC_7986.jpg
    DSC_7986.jpg
    30.7 KB · Views: 75
  • DSC_7971.jpg
    DSC_7971.jpg
    29.6 KB · Views: 78
  • DSC_7952.jpg
    DSC_7952.jpg
    37.8 KB · Views: 79
  • DSC_7949.jpg
    DSC_7949.jpg
    40.1 KB · Views: 86
  • DSC_8447.jpg
    DSC_8447.jpg
    43 KB · Views: 77
Saturday I was trying to shoot in aperture priority, using light as the guage and letting it auto-adust shutter speed. I am much better at judging what shutter speed to use in shutter priority, which is what I went back to. The problem with aperture priority is that the shutter speed will change depending on where the camera is pointed. As you get closer to reflective objects or the sun, the shutter speed gets higher. Exact opposite as the objects get darker or shadowed.

So you need to constantly adjust, sometimes as you are panning back and forth. Not ideal for fast moving objects. So Sunday I went back to shutter priority and things looked MUCH better.

Here is an example of a photo disaster. About 25-50% of my saturday shots looked like this. Another 25% were passable at lower res. The other 25% were good enough for prints. That is by far the worst percentage of usable shots I have had since having the Nikon. BUt it was an experiment and a lesson learned. But it does go to show that I do sometimes take crappy shots too. :)
 

Attachments

  • crap_DSC_6989.jpg
    crap_DSC_6989.jpg
    33.4 KB · Views: 85
Cheers. If it saves someone else a day of wasted shots, it's worth it. Not a huge deal for me as I always attend both days at Camarillo. If it was Edwards, 2.5 hours away and I only attend 1 day, I would be pissed!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back