What other fighters could have been made available to the marines at Battle of Midway

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

But nothing really changed that much between the Marine fighters at Midway and early Guadalcanal.Joe

At Midway, Tomonaga's raid flew at 11,000-12,000 ft. AFAIK Guadalcanal raids flew much higher. Big difference considering the performance of P-39D and and P-40E.
 
About June 5th, the auxilliary carrier Long Island (AVG-1 or CVE-1) was cruising off the west coast providing cover to Batdiv 4 consisting 7 old pre-1930 battleships and as many destroyers under Adm. William Pye. Acting as a shield for the west coast (?) or as much to keep him out of trouble while Midway was fought according to Lundstrom. The Long Island's airwing at that time but in August carried 12 non-folding wing SBD and 19 folding wing F4F-4 aircraft to Guadacanal. It could probably carry about 15-20 P-40 or P-39 aircraft for a flyoff to Midway in a pinch or maybe 3 P-38s . Flight deck dimensions were about 400+ ft by about 60 ft I believe.
 

Attachments

  • Cve1a.jpg
    61 KB · Views: 89
Last edited:
Everyone seems to concentrate on P39's and P40's. Could the USAAF have flown 26 P38 Lightnings to Midway from Pearl Harbor? Seems like that would have been the best USAAF fighter at the time for intercepting Japanese aircraft. Was the P38 a combat ready aircraft in May, 1942?
 
Already answered in this very thread:


So yes, there were P-38s that were combat capable in May 1942.
 
Already answered in this very thread:



So yes, there were P-38s that were combat capable in May 1942.

I read that earlier and it didn't sink in. Thank you.

Looks like 2 dozen AAF P38's would have been perfect to equip Midway with. Any thoughts?
 

According to The First Team (p337), only "one or two" A6Ms were shot down by the Marine fighters, who started the combat with a considerable altitude advantage. of the 23 USMC fighters 15 were lost, and only 2 were combat ready after landing.
 
Everyone seems to concentrate on P39's and P40's.

Yes, IMHO, the USMC should have requested several squadrons worth of CCF built Hawker Hurricanes, the only North American built fighter that could hope to cope with the Zero.
 
Yes, IMHO, the USMC should have requested several squadrons worth of CCF built Hawker Hurricanes, the only North American built fighter that could hope to cope with the Zero.

Historically, the Hurricane didn't do well at all against the Zero. If P38's were operational at that time, that would have been THE airplane for intercepting a bombing raid.
 
Historically, the Hurricane didn't do well at all against the Zero. If P38's were operational at that time, that would have been THE airplane for intercepting a bombing raid.

Historically, the Hurricanes never had a dream setup like the USMC had on Midway, where they had lots of advance warning and an altitude advantage prior to engaging. The Hurricane XII could outclimb, outrun, outturn and had a better ceiling than anything the Marines had at Midway and had to do better, with the same pilots against the IJNAF.
 
Yes, IMHO, the USMC should have requested several squadrons worth of CCF built Hawker Hurricanes, the only North American built fighter that could hope to cope with the Zero.

That choice (Hurricane) might have been a bit (see below) better than the F2A F4F combination assuming they were flown by pilots familiar with the huricane. However it would have totally eliminated the option to conduct an escorted strike which is too desirable an option to neglect even if Simard did so.

Historically, the Hurricane didn't do well at all against the Zero. If P38's were operational at that time, that would have been THE airplane for intercepting a bombing raid.

I suspect that the VMF squadron pilots had problems precisely because they didn't use whatever altitude advantage they might have had to best advantage and couldn't resist the urge to dogfight. The reputation of the early F2A was as a premier dogfighter. Whatever later developments did to its standing in that regard, I doubt the Marine pilots would have been loathe to try it out as such. Consider the short time between the British/Dutch experience to and Midway to absorb the lessons and the fact that the two types of aircraft (B339 and B449 were NOT the same aircraft as the USN/USMC F2A-3s). It has been said before in this forum that USN/USMC had some early success because they studied deflection shooting more than many if not most other air arms. reading accounts of the FEAF in the PI and Java, this seems to be borne out. How would adding Hurricanes, P-38s, FW-190s, P-51s or Spitfires have changed the outcome of this battle? It didn't turn on the results over or at Midway. It didn't matter how badly the island was bombed by the aircraft in the IJN strike package. The runway was back in operation very quickly which contributed in a substantial way to the battle's outcome strangely enough....

WRT tactics to counter the A6M, aside from Boom and Zoom developed for the USA by Chennault in China, there was the Thach Weave, implemented for the first time on this date 6/4/42 because the Navy had experience with the A6M and as yet, the Marines hadn't except perhaps at Wake, which didn't help much.
 
Last edited:
Of the 124 aircraft based at midway, there was not one liquid cooled engine, let alone a Merlin engine. You'd have to ship in some mechanics with those Hurricanes.

Of course as short as the battle was for Midway itself, that wouldn't matter. But they wouldn't have known that beforehand.
 

The Hurricane had been using drop tanks from early/mid 1941.
 

Exactly, and that's important in both the short and long run.
 

Same for P38/P39/P40.
 
The Hurricane had been using drop tanks from early/mid 1941.
50-58 gallon drop tanks on the F4F extended its combat range by about 50 miles at most out to 225 miles or from about 800 miles to about 900 for total range. How does that compare to the Hurricane's combat range with similar sized drops ot whatever size it actually used?
 

I don't think you could pack the upper deck that full of Army aircraft, they can't be catapult launched, AFAIK. You'd need to leave part of that upper deck clear for the first few aircraft to fly off.
 
I don't think you could pack the upper deck that full of Army aircraft, they can't be catapult launched, AFAIK. You'd need to leave part of that upper deck clear for the first few aircraft to fly off.
They used the Wasp IIRC to fly a good number (47) of Spits off for Malta in spring 42
 

Users who are viewing this thread