Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Anything that involves lots of men and/or heavy weapons is doomed to failure
I may be incorrct but didn't the Aussies usually historicily hold the upper hand over the Germans and can't see where it would change when fighting on their home turf .Hardly.
Unless severely damaging a city, and causing heavy casualties to the native forces thereby creating panic in the country is failure in your eyes.
If no more surprise attacks are possible, or if the unit is getting close to having its secret location discovered it can be extracted by the KM or Japanese navy. That way there are no dead bad guys to show the press.
If the unit is equipped as I listed then it would be a huge task to take them out.
As long as before they intiate their attack the commandos make sure to establish themselves around the targeted city, placing watch posts at each entry road and a good central hiding and defensive position, they will have a huge advantage. Commandeering cars from natives the night before the attack would be very smart as it will provide a good getaway option.
I may be incorrct but didn't the Aussies usually historicily hold the upper hand over the Germans and can't see where it would change when fighting on their home turf .
Stop some native trucks and cars at night and commandeer them out of the natives hands, stealing them, and taking the natives as hostages.
Hardly.
Unless severely damaging a city, and causing heavy casualties to the native forces thereby creating panic in the country is failure in your eyes.
If no more surprise attacks are possible, or if the unit is getting close to having its secret location discovered it can be extracted by the KM or Japanese navy. That way there are no dead bad guys to show the press.
If the unit is equipped as I listed then it would be a huge task to take them out.
As long as before they intiate their attack the commandos make sure to establish themselves around the targeted city, placing watch posts at each entry road and a good central hiding and defensive position, they will have a huge advantage. Commandeering cars from natives the night before the attack would be very smart as it will provide a good getaway option.
No the Aussies didn't hold anything over the Germans.
c) Small point, the FJ52 didn't work very well being to light for the full bore ammo
As Wildcat pointed out the Darwin raid led to a panic flight of military personnel and civilians into the interior. A number of books have been published on the subject and conclude that it wasn't one of Australia's better moments in the war.
But if the Japenese did attack an Austrialian city with a suicide commando attack, it would definitely freak the citizens out in a big way. Same in the US or anywhere else. Especially if it was a sneak attack during the start of a war (as apposed to an action in the middle of a war).
I have been a little slow getting to this thread but it is an interesting idea. I don't think that a suicide mission would do much good. It may well cause some damage ad even a minor panic but there is one problem with a suicide mission.
The attackers are dead, the defenders can prove it, the attacks stop and the defenders can claim victory.
You need something more to be effective, continual small strikes that can cause significant damage, that happen again and again, spread uncertainty.
Anything that involves lots of men and/or heavy weapons is doomed to failure
...and as they drive through the check point a cunning 'native' guard tells the lorry driver "You speak good English!" The driver replies "DANKE!" and the games up!
(Courtesy of a similar scene from the movie 'The Great Escape')
By the way Soren, I like your idea of roving squads of commando's creating havoc in the rear area's. There will be thousands of checkpoints nationwide, with soldiers asking passing cars "How many home runs did Babe Ruth hit last year?" {"Oh bloody hell, I'm British, can't you ask me a cricket question?"}
I don't think that you read my posting. You are not asking your men to carry 35kg, your asking them to carry 56.5KG if you include ammo and personal pack.Glider,
I know exactly what I would have my men do. But you're seriously underestimating what each man is capable of! Try asking me how long I was forced to walk with a 35 kg backpack..
The S-18/1000 was assigned to two men, these two men had to carry it around, that's how it was done. The weapon weighs 45 kg with an empty mag, and so around 47 kg with a full one. The weapon is meant to be taken apart when carried over long distances, one man carrying the barrel (Which is the heavy part) the other rest of the weapon.
of course, walk in the parkThis is easily done Glider.
And who is carrying the ammo which weighs 270 KG?Regarding the LG40, well it's not like the poor guys have to carry it, incase you didn't notice its got wheelsAnd its very easy to transport, a single man being able to tow it. So the LG40 only needs a single man to transport it.
As for the 120mm mortar, this is the toughest one to transport, but again it is meant to be taken apart for transport like every other mortar. With six man each it can be transported quite easily. The shells have to be brought in afterwards ofcourse, so it's a two time trip, or a three time trips if they want it even easier. Getting it ashore is ZERO problem.
Anyway if they want it really easy all they have to do is commandeer a single truck and load the 120's onto it.
FJ52 ??? Full bore ammo ???
Incase you're talking about the FG-42 it wasn't too light at all. The FG-42 is a highly regarded weapon to this day, praised by gun experts as one of the finest smallarms ever built and by far the most advanced of WW2. Its characteristics can be summerized as such: Extremely precise, light, rugged, extremely comfortable and easy to wield, high rate of fire, easily handled in bursts, easily controlled on full auto when using the attached legs.
Anyway if you want an opinion from someone who actually fired the weapon try asking Les what he thought of it, if I recall correctly he said it was one of the greatest weapons from the last 70 years.
As to the full bore ammo, well I have no clue where you got that from, but you're probably trying to say that the FG-42 used the full power 7.92x57mm round instead of the 7.92x33 Kurz used by the StG.44.
I don't think that you read my posting. You are not asking your men to carry 35kg, your asking them to carry 56.5KG if you include ammo and personal pack. of course, walk in the park
And who is carrying the ammo which weighs 270 KG?
Check out the size of a 120 mortar. One of these mortars will need 24 man loads and that is without their own packs. It is totally impractical.
You haven't addressed the issue of how you are going to get all these men and tons of equipment to the coast, how are you going to get them ashore and how you are going to hide all this equipment and move it without being seen.
PS I have also served and carried packs, so I do know what is possible.
And who is carrying the ammo which weighs 270 KG?
Check out the size of a 120 mortar. One of these mortars will need 24 man loads and that is without their own packs. It is totally impractical.
You haven't addressed the issue of how you are going to get all these men and tons of equipment to the coast, how are you going to get them ashore and how you are going to hide all this equipment and move it without being seen.
PS I have also served and carried packs, so I do know what is possible.