Best tank killer aircraft of WW2 Part I

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Status
Not open for further replies.
There were not alot of TP-38s. At least that is what I have heard. Most pilots got the training that I mentioned from my conversation with Bob Grainger. That was training in the states, mind you. Before he got that "training", he had never flown a multi-engined aircraft!
 
This is what I mean:




While the P-38 design was starting to prove itself in testing and combat, one underlying problem still existed. Compressibility was still a major obstacle in the performance of the P-38, and it led to many rumors and myth about the flight characteristics. One prototype P-38 was modified for dive testing. An older P-38 E was the aircraft used for this experimentation. The forward gondola section was moved forward by thirty inches, and the cockpit was move forward by thirty-six inches. The cockpit flight controls were the same, but there was room behind the pilot for a co-pilot/observer/test engineer. This modified P-38 E "Swordfish" first too flight on June 2, 1943 and was immediately put into extensive dive tests. The tests would have limited results, but this design led into another use for this type of P-38.



AAF training before Pearl Harbor was only designed to train between 12,000 - 13,000 pilots each year. After the attack, plans were changed and the numbers were increased significantly. However, the problem was that the government was unprepared for any armed conflicts, and pilots were being forced into the P-38 without adequate training. There were no twin-engine trainers available, but when the British balked at purchasing the Model 322 Lightning I fighters, they were employed as trainers. They were basically stripped down models of the P-38, but they were still rather advanced for the average trained pilot taking the controls for the first time. Johnson envisioned the P-38 Swordfish to be used to take pilot trainees along for demonstration flights with an experienced pilot at the controls. This would dispel many rumors and raise confidence in inexperienced pilots. Lockheed test pilot Jimmy Mattern was sent on tour with a Swordfish version of the P-38. He performed maneuvers that were normally feared by the recruits, such as rolling into a "dead" engine and many low-level aerobatics. After five months of training sessions, P-38 accident rates dropped from 6.5% to 1.5%. Mattern would receive the Civil Medal of Merit for his actions, which saved the lives of many recruits. Once again, the P-38 demonstrated its versatility and value to the Allied cause.

www.p-38online.com
 

Attachments

  • sword.jpeg
    35.1 KB · Views: 456
That was also used for testing the laminar flow wings, which you can see in the picture. They were looking for ways to resolve the compressibility with this. There were some dual engine trainers later (AT-11? I think).
 
evangilder said:
That was also used for testing the laminar flow wings, which you can see in the picture. They were looking for ways to resolve the compressibility with this. There were some dual engine trainers later (AT-11? I think).

Compressability problems were never resolved in the P-38. However, the L-model (and some J's by retrofit) were equiped with dive recovery flaps on the lower wing which helped in high speed dive recovery (and also could be used to get inside an opponent in a turn fight).

=S=

Lunatic
 
evangilder said:
That was also used for testing the laminar flow wings, which you can see in the picture. They were looking for ways to resolve the compressibility with this. There were some dual engine trainers later (AT-11? I think).

My bad, I understand now what you were saying. Sorry about that. You meant there were dual engine trainers. And yes there was the Beech AT-7/AT-11 Kansan, and the Curtis-Wright AT-9 Jeep. There may have been more though.

 

Attachments

  • at7-1.jpg
    19.3 KB · Views: 588
  • at9-1.jpg
    22 KB · Views: 603
cheddar cheese said:
Dont think so - I know about most of my stuff on the -38 from www.p-38online.com. its a great site on the P-38.

That is a decent P-38 site. Here are some others:

http://home.att.net/~jbaugher1/p38.html
http://home.att.net/~ww2aviation/P-38.html
http://home.worldonline.dk/winthrop/p38.html
http://homepage.tinet.ie/~frontacs/WBStored/P38PilotComments.html (interesting comments about WEP usage and engine turns)
http://www.zenoswarbirdvideos.com/P38.html (video and other info)
http://www.475thfghf.org/Lindbergh.htm
http://home.st.net.au/~dunn/ozatwar/lindbergh.htm
http://www.kazoku.org/xp-38n/articles/p38info.htm (for flight sim modeling but some good info too)
http://www.acepilots.com/usaaf_pto_aces.html (PTO Aces - mostly P-38 )
http://home.worldonline.dk/winthrop/p38op1.html (operating manual - mostly as regaurds takeoff and landing)
http://home.att.net/~ww2aircraft/Profiles.html (about the P-38 being a "big target")
http://www.uswarplanes.net/p38.htm (production info)
http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org/URG/p38.htm

=S=

Lunatic
 
evangilder said:
I know they never resolved it, I said they were looking for ways to solve it. The dive recovery flaps with the power operated ailerons helped the manueverability.

The dive recovery flaps mostly helped avoid terminal dives (where it is impossible to pull out). In some circumstances they could also provide a little extra turn, but I think those instances were rare.

=S=

Lunatic
 
Problems of the P-38:

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread