Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules
Canada would be with the US, or occupied by the US.
I'm on the side of standstill depending on whether or not we develop nucs first. First, Britain and France capitulating probably doesn't mean whole hearted 'co-operation' from the Empire or even England. Second USSR won't be joining Hitler - it will be VERY busy trying to build up for the other shoe to drop. Even if Hitler attacked USSR to take them out I'm not convinced that the new Alliance could defeat them
The combined fleets are interesting but don't believe there is any possiblity -logistics wise of getting and keeping a toe hold in the Americas. The bad guys have to take (not destroy) the Panama Canal to achieve relative mobility of sea power. We can build subs at an alarming rate to neutralize off shore combined navies - alnding in SA and proceeding North gets pretty grisly when you reach Central America - looking a lot like New Guinea.
US manufacturing capability higher than all the ones you mentioned combined and pretty self sufficent in raw materials.
There is no place close enough to base airpower that is out of reach from US airpower.
Can't defeat US w/o invading and occupying - can't occupy w/o overwhelming air and seapower advantage, and can't get that w/o airpower close enough to destroy industry (West Coast and Central US) that in turn is close enough for US to destroy that.
And have to gear up for that invasion within say 12 months of the Grand Alliance.
The US can build subs fast yes, but so can Europe and better ones at that - the German subs would prove an absolute nightmare for the US navy, esp. the later Type XXI's.
Taking the Panama Canal is very plausible when you consider that the EA alliance will have complete command of the sea, and with plenty of carriers to atleast equal the concentration of the US airforce - the EA subs would help protect the logistic connection across the Atlantic.
This would enable the EA to carry out a naval bombardment of the US coasts and have have a/c to clear the surrounding airspace. The landbased invasion could be initiated in the northern part of South America, that would give plenty of time to fully assemble a large enough force to pose a threat from that side.
Meanwhile a huge invasion force crossing the Bering Sea would open up a front in Canada using Alaska as a base.
In an Alliance between Europe and Asia, no. Look at what force the USSR could assemble alone - they built more tanks than the US alone.
Correct, there will be a confrontation between the EA and US airforce - the EA however can muster more and better a/c - in 1940 - 1942 the E/A will have the A6M Zero with its extreme range, something which will help any invasion force alot - later on when the EA has gained ground there will be bases from which landbased fighters can operate, and that will act as a real boost to the invasion of North America, esp. when the Me-262 can be delivered in numbers - it would sweep away any resistance in the air.
The US can't destroy the E/A Navy however, as trying to do so would end with a direct confrontation - one which the E/A alliance will most surely win. Early in the war the range of the A6M Zero will prove decisive, as it will allow the EA alliance to establish a foothold on North America from which landbased a/c can be launched as-well as troops.
Again the sheer manpower and resources of Europa and Asia united combined with most namely the German advances in technology would be enough to ensure the completion of the most modern and largest military force on the planet within 12 months.
Who's taking the bets?
No matter what gents.....it would be a slaughterhouse.
What effective methods díd the Allies have against subs in 1941 ?? Thats right, none really - the German Uboats were having a field day.
What fighter did the US have which could effectively oppose the A6M Zero in 1941 ? Thats right, none.
What fighter did the US ever have which could oppose the Me-262 ? Thats right, none.
What destroyer can ever hope to be effective against the Type XXI U-boat which boasted 17.5 - 18 knots submerged and was dead silent on approach with its top modern stealth engine, being nearly undetectable ? Thats right, none.
What tank did the US have which could prove effective against German USSR tanks of the similar period ? Thats right, none, the German USSR tanks would have themselves a turkey shoot.
What smallarms did the US have which could match the Stg.44 MG-42 ? Again, none.
Btw, with the financial and industrial help of the rest of Europe Asia you can expect Type XXI subs, Me-262's V-2's being around much earlier.
And as to production - you'd be astounded to know how much Germany would've built alone if it wasn't for Allied bombing. And since no European or Asian country needs to fear bombing in this scenario the combined production rate of the EA alliance would skyrocket.
The only thing America would have going for it in this situation would be numbers, and even that would be negated by the sheer number of troops against them.
Their navy would be taken out by the sheer numbers of the combined "allied" force
None, not untill 1943 when plenty of radar equipped escorts and plentifull air cover decimated the U-Boats.
The P38, P40 and F4F at the start of the war more than held their own.
Then the F4U and F6F piled in on the fight.
Any more questions?
And they wouldnt be in quantity untll 1945.
But then again, the short range of the -262 precluded it from any meaningfull offensive roles.
They first were deployed in April of 1945?
The US could out produce the EA in tank production,
so we would always end up winning the fight.
The M4 was easy to build and maintain.
Plus the Pershing was the best MBT at the end of the war, so the US was more than capable f designing and building a great tank(s)
So the war is going to be decided by small arms?
You dont look at economic stats from the period do you. By any chance, do you understand what the "GNP is?
The scarey thing about the US industrial strengths during the war was the US economy didn't slow down one bit. In fact, economic figures show that there was still plenty of reserve capacity in the economy to grow even bigger!
Even better for the US military/industrial machine was not much would need to be shared or wasted on Russian or GB.
Decimated ? Syscom3 don't you forget how many took part in fighting the U-boats besides the US ! Don't forget how huge and crucial a part Britain played in the war of the Atlantic ! Without that help the US navy would've needed alot of life-rafts !
Wake up man ! In 1941 the A6M Zero swepped all opposition and forced the US fighters to rely on dangerous hit and run tactics.
By which time Germany Britain produced equal or superior fighters. The FW-190 and Bf-109 could easily be made carrier capable, just as the Spitfire was.
Very ignorant of you again Syscom3 - By help of German funding alone the Me-262 could've been ready as early as 1943, Hitler however again slowed down the process by not wanting to finance the project, which I will again point out would not have been the case in this EA alliance where funds are plentiful.
Short range ??? Do you even know how far the Me-262A-1 could go on internal fuel alone ?? Put a few drop tanks on a *voila !* one long range Jet at your disposal ! The US a/c would have no alternate other than stay on the ground or get shot down.
Again you don't read very well so I'll repeat it for you in bold letters this time: With the financial and industrial help of the rest of Europe Asia you can expect Type XXI subs, Me-262's V-2's being around much earlier.
Stop lying Syscom3, the US could not and did not even out-produce the Soviets in tanks, and thats a fact.
The M4 was easy getting blown to itty bitty pieces as-well - real good infact !
Again you're lying your pants off Syscom3... The Pershing was nowhere near the best MBT by wars end, thats just another one of your lies.. Even the Tiger Ausf.E was superior in every sense but armor protection !
Go ask the coalition forces currently in Iraq how much the smallarm matters please! By doing so you'll only get alot wiser.
You're clueless.