dangerous mission

Ad: This forum contains affiliate links to products on Amazon and eBay. More information in Terms and rules

Renrich
how about the Kamikaze raid against Ulithi around 11 March 45, very long oversea flight without any hope of return. One cannot get past 100% losses.

Juha
 
I tried to phrase it carefully so that it would be clear that we would identify a specific mission like the Doolittle Raid ,the raid(I can't remember the details) where the RAF bombed the jail or Gestapo headquarters or perhaps the Pearl Harbor raid.
Amiens , Copenhagen or Taranto
 
Renrich
how about the Kamikaze raid against Ulithi around 11 March 45, very long oversea flight without any hope of return. One cannot get past 100% losses.

Juha

Yeah, that's what I was thinking. Kamikaze has to be the worst. How do you get past 100% casualties?

But on general missions where the aircraft was expected to come home (every day affairs that happened for years) I would give it to Bomber Command and their offensive into Germany. The loss rate, in general, exceeded 50% for all crews. And Bomber Command sustained it for years.
 
As far as a single, most dangerous mission, I'd go with Ploesti.

As far as a single, most dangerous job, I'd go with any bomber mission, especially before the P-51's and P-47's came along.

2nd to that, I'd pick doing an attack in a torpedo plane.

I would discount the Kamikaze missions because that is a suicide mission. IMO, it doesn't really count as being "possibly" dangerous. I'm thinking the word "dangerous" involves the crew members are wanting to come home.
 
Thorlifter
now because English isn't my mother language, I'll not argue on the exact meaning of the word dangerous, to me a mission is more dangerous if the chances to survive are less. That's why I picked the Ulithi raid, in it chances to survive were even less than in a normal kamikaze mission bacause the target was so far away, if one didn't find it he just went missing as most of the Japanese went, IIRC only 3 Franceses/Gingas found Ulithi, one crashing into CV Randolph, one into a tanker and one onto a small island.

But IMHO there are many other more dangerous missions that that of Tidal Wave, for ex the above mentioned US torpedo attack against Japanese carriers at Midway, those flown by Battle crews against Sedan bridges on around 13.5.40, those flown by Soviet SB crews against German panzer spearheads in late June 41, losses many times over 50% and even the attack of FAF Do 17Zs from PLeLv 46 against Soviet tank formations at 300m on 11 June 44, losses were exactly 50%.

Juha
 
The reason I put the Ploesti raid above the torpedo attack at Midway is this. The torpedo attack was supposed to be a coordinated attack, utilizing dive bombers and fighter cover. It turned out to be almost a suicide mission due to the torpedo planes going in without either.

The Ploesti raid, they knew they were attacking the most heavily defended area Germany had, with maybe exception of Berlin itself. They knew they didn't have fighter escorts and had to do it themselves.
 
I would discount the Kamikaze missions because that is a suicide mission. IMO, it doesn't really count as being "possibly" dangerous. I'm thinking the word "dangerous" involves the crew members are wanting to come home.

Agree 100%. Kamikaze missions should not count. Danger wasn't an issue. They were gonna die one way or the other anyway.

TO
 
must agree with Juha in one battle I'm most familiar with at the Sedan Bridgehead
from Wiki

On 14 May 1940, in a desperate attempt to stop German forces crossing the Meuse, the Advanced Air Striking Force launched an "all-out" attack by all available bombers against the German bridgehead and pontoon bridges at Sedan. The light bombers were swarmed by opposing fighters and were devastated. Out of a strike force of 63 Battles and 8 Bristol Blenheims, 40 (including 35 Battles) were lost After these abortive raids, the Battle was switched to mainly night attacks, with much lower losses
A
 
One to consider:
May 10th 1940, 11 Douglas 8A 3N take off to fight off attacking german airplanes. The a/c is totally unfit for this job as it is mainly a groud attack plane, but lack of enough fighters forces the dutch airforce to use them otherwise. Take off at 4.00h, last Douglas was shot down at 4.30, falling into an oiltank near Rotterdam. No douglas plane survives the first 30 minutes of the war...
3286703849.jpg
 
Yeah, that's a good one Marcel. By scale, it doesn't compare to some of the deep bomber raids, but 100% loss in a mission where they probably knew they would be completely overwhelmed, that certainly could qualify for the most dangerous mission.
 
I think the RAF Gladiator fighters sent to Norway in April 1940 had it tough. Frozen lakes as airfields, biplanes against Bf 109s and Bf 110s, no ground facilities or supplies and cold. Pretty tough for the few days and weeks they were there.

Best is when they evacuated, these land pilots had to fly them out and land on a carrier - for the first time!
 
I think we should get a few more suggestios as this is Poll worthy
Sedan Bridges
Ploesti
Dambusters
Devasatators at Midway
Faith Hope and Charity
Marcels Juhas Njaco all have good suggestions that would make for good debates
 
So many heroes. Some.

All LW pilots in late 44 to wars end. Into the fire.

Doolittle raid. Launched early, knew their range was insufficient, knew their chances were small.

B-17/24 crews, from on-set of deep penetration raids until late 44. Survive, go to bed, get up, go again.

Naval strikes against Japanese fleet off Truk. Not enough fuel. How would you like to ditch in the middle of the Pacific and hope to be rescued. Sharks?

So many others in all the services. I will not pick one. Naming one group disrespects the others. I cannot even grasp the courage it takes to make the decisions they did. Heroes, all.
 
Its not so much as picking one better than the other as just recognizing some missions were tougher than others and some had more than courage to attempt them.
 
so with all these battle-info-suicidal missions what is going to become of them on this thread ? wonder is this some sort of project that will be worked on for the future of the site ??
 
ah but which Ploesti mission as there are many ?

Schweinfurt is one of several days of 60 plus lost by the US just for information purposes. look into January 11, 1944 most likely worse overall for both sides that the August or October 43 battles

August 1,1943 - Ploesti, after the first Halpro mission which was a small high level attack by only a few B-24s.

The Tidal Wave mission gets my vote. Large force, complex route structure requiring critical timing, lead crew lost in bound, wrong turns made, Germans well prepared, low flying -slow B-24s in broud daylight, extremely well defended by light and heavy flak plus fighters -

Can't think of another mission as bold, as dangerous or least suited to the airfame or doctrine of any Air Force.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back